Re: [PATCH v24 08/12] mfd: psci-mfd: Add psci-reboot-mode child cell
Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.mfd,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMRc=Me7Nua8xgKA43rCH9SV2DQoCyAuOqb+KNDTuPxv_H5y9A@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 10:18:56 +0200, Lee Jones <[email protected]> said: > On Mon, 03 Aug 2026, Shivendra Pratap wrote: > >> The PSCI "reboot-mode" node does not define a compatible because it is a >> configuration of boot-states provided by the underlying firmware. With >> the new firmware-node based cells in mfd-core, this node can now be >> exposed as a proper child cell. >> >> Add the psci-reboot-mode child cell to the psci-mfd driver with a >> named_fwnode. Add psci-cpuidle-domain cell first to isolate it from >> reboot-mode failures. >> >> Suggested-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Shivendra Pratap <[email protected]> >> --- ... >> + if (ret) { >> + if (ret == -ENOMEM) >> + goto out; >> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "reboot-mode child cell failed to add: %d\n", ret); > > Okay Yoda, but why is this okay? > Hi Lee, I'd like to call you out on this because making snarky comments on a non-native English speaker's syntax is really not OK. Please don't do this. As a native speaker you could have just proposed a better sounding version. Thanks, Bartosz