Re: [PATCH v24 08/12] mfd: psci-mfd: Add psci-reboot-mode child cell
Lee Jones <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.mfd,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 10:18:56 +0200, Lee Jones <[email protected]> said: > > On Mon, 03 Aug 2026, Shivendra Pratap wrote: > > > >> The PSCI "reboot-mode" node does not define a compatible because it is a > >> configuration of boot-states provided by the underlying firmware. With > >> the new firmware-node based cells in mfd-core, this node can now be > >> exposed as a proper child cell. > >> > >> Add the psci-reboot-mode child cell to the psci-mfd driver with a > >> named_fwnode. Add psci-cpuidle-domain cell first to isolate it from > >> reboot-mode failures. > >> > >> Suggested-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]> > >> Signed-off-by: Shivendra Pratap <[email protected]> > >> --- > > ... > > >> + if (ret) { > >> + if (ret == -ENOMEM) > >> + goto out; > >> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "reboot-mode child cell failed to add: %d\n", ret); > > > > Okay Yoda, but why is this okay? > > > > Hi Lee, > > I'd like to call you out on this because making snarky comments on a non-native > English speaker's syntax is really not OK. Please don't do this. As a native > speaker you could have just proposed a better sounding version. It wasn't supposed to be offensive, it just made me chuckle. I unreservedly apologise if any offence or ill-feeling that may have occurred. -- Lee Jones