Re: [PATCH v24 08/12] mfd: psci-mfd: Add psci-reboot-mode child cell

Lee Jones <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.mfd,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 10:18:56 +0200, Lee Jones <[email protected]> said:
> > On Mon, 03 Aug 2026, Shivendra Pratap wrote:
> >
> >> The PSCI "reboot-mode" node does not define a compatible because it is a
> >> configuration of boot-states provided by the underlying firmware. With
> >> the new firmware-node based cells in mfd-core, this node can now be
> >> exposed as a proper child cell.
> >>
> >> Add the psci-reboot-mode child cell to the psci-mfd driver with a
> >> named_fwnode. Add psci-cpuidle-domain cell first to isolate it from
> >> reboot-mode failures.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
> >> Signed-off-by: Shivendra Pratap <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> 
> ...
> 
> >> +	if (ret) {
> >> +		if (ret == -ENOMEM)
> >> +			goto out;
> >> +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "reboot-mode child cell failed to add: %d\n", ret);
> >
> > Okay Yoda, but why is this okay?
> >
> 
> Hi Lee,
> 
> I'd like to call you out on this because making snarky comments on a non-native
> English speaker's syntax is really not OK. Please don't do this. As a native
> speaker you could have just proposed a better sounding version.

It wasn't supposed to be offensive, it just made me chuckle.

I unreservedly apologise if any offence or ill-feeling that may have occurred.

-- 
Lee Jones
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.