Re: [PATCH v3 10/23] mfd: Drop unused assignment of spi_device_id driver data
Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.mfd,dev.linux.lists.sashiko-reviews |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <alAGbQ3y3oO5L8av@monoceros> |
Hello, On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 05:09:01PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > [Severity: Low] > This isn't a bug, but does the commit message subject omit the mandatory > driver name component? As before, I think this isn't justified. The patch touches three drivers below drivers/mfd, so there is no unique driver name component. Best regards Uwe
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEP4GsaTp6HlmJrf7Tj4D7WH0S/k4FAmpQB0MACgkQj4D7WH0S /k6kpAf9EeakYkLHNwsQ+OLp7eYfuwMapxmCF989pKRpwo9r3VMjEXsRzM0ybBty +c+Hr7yDhElPZt5JbaaZv0dtc11y3Ostnl0Em/05QDWCoW+bQLpqPvD0ZFoPtGuR Neebp6Ddjg331srQiKNWyQoVFMfk/c4lMoGwBeObZ1fm+vLVr35Nb5njP1ba0M6X Y7adP1KR5ejsmU8o6hlgjrilSFM/TfuOuW/gR+DOiPTNORBIJllLYExHc1IbDu4t x7r8s3DKD3l0loqeDAXgzrTwUAjoQoBepKN73bnxolObcrj4pQSXfYRMN4cTSkzO o3L/kJCCeFivOORca7CRhM/bCw/Fbw== =Xn5u -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----