Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The `psci-reboot-mode` platform driver is completely unreachable dead code because it lacks an `of_match_table` and is never instantiated as a child device by the parent PSCI or MFD driver.
- [High] Lockless read of `reset_cmd` in `psci_sys_reset()` can race with concurrent updates via `psci_set_reset_cmd()`.
- [Medium] The `PSCI_REBOOT_MODE` config is set to `bool`, which forces the `REBOOT_MODE` framework to be built-in.
--
--- Patch [7]: [PATCH v23 07/13] power: reset: Add psci-reboot-mode driver ---
commit 05cd2956034a357b1e7d5eab96bdce4575604285
Author: Shivendra Pratap <[email protected]>
power: reset: Add psci-reboot-mode driver
Add a psci-reboot-mode driver to handle different types of PSCI resets,
including predefined and vendor-specific resets, at one place. It registers
with the reboot-mode framework to interface these resets to userspace and
passes arguments to the PSCI driver for command-based reset.
> diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/Kconfig b/drivers/power/reset/Kconfig
> index 124afb99febe9..93e4029d95060 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/reset/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/power/reset/Kconfig
> @@ -348,6 +348,16 @@ config NVMEM_REBOOT_MODE
> then the bootloader can read it and take different
> action according to the mode.
>
> +config PSCI_REBOOT_MODE
> + bool "PSCI reboot mode driver"
> + depends on OF && (ARM_PSCI_FW || COMPILE_TEST)
> + select REBOOT_MODE
[Severity: Medium]
Will this force the REBOOT_MODE framework to always be built-in?
Since PSCI_REBOOT_MODE is defined as a bool, selecting the REBOOT_MODE
tristate will forcefully upgrade the entire reboot-mode framework to built-in
(=y), which overrides user configurations that might prefer it as a module.
Also, since the driver source uses module_platform_driver and MODULE_LICENSE,
it appears designed to be built as a module. Should this be a tristate instead?
> + help
> + Say y here will enable PSCI reboot mode driver. This gets
> + the PSCI reboot mode arguments and passes them to psci
> + driver. psci driver uses these arguments for issuing
> + device reset into different boot states.
> +
> config POWER_MLXBF
> tristate "Mellanox BlueField power handling driver"
> depends on (GPIO_MLXBF2 || GPIO_MLXBF3) && ACPI
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/psci-reboot-mode.c b/drivers/power/reset/psci-reboot-mode.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..955ed68f14026
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/power/reset/psci-reboot-mode.c
[ ... ]
> +static int psci_reboot_mode_write(struct reboot_mode_driver *reboot,
> + u32 *magic, int count)
> +{
> + if (count < 1 || count > 3)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return psci_set_reset_cmd(magic[0], psci_reboot_mode_get_cookie(magic, count));
[Severity: High]
Can this call to psci_set_reset_cmd() race with the atomic restart handler?
Looking at drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c, psci_sys_reset() evaluates reset_cmd
locklessly:
if ((reset_cmd.reset_type || reset_cmd.cookie) && !panic_in_progress())
psci_handle_reset_cmd();
And psci_set_reset_cmd() protects writes using a mutex:
reset_cmd.reset_type = reset_type;
reset_cmd.cookie = cookie;
If an atomic restart handler like psci_sys_reset() executes during a SysRq-B
emergency restart and interrupts a CPU executing psci_set_reset_cmd(), it could
observe a partially updated state.
Since the 64-bit cookie may be written via multiple instructions on 32-bit ARM,
could this lead to torn reads and mismatched reset types, causing the system to
hang during emergency restarts?
> +}
[ ... ]
> +static struct platform_driver psci_reboot_mode_driver = {
> + .probe = psci_reboot_mode_probe,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "psci-reboot-mode",
> + },
> +};
[Severity: High]
Is this platform driver able to probe?
The driver lacks an of_match_table and is not instantiated as a child device
by any parent PSCI or MFD driver.
A platform driver without an of_match_table must be manually instantiated
(e.g., via mfd_add_devices in an MFD parent like psci-mfd.c). However,
psci_reboot_mode is not listed in psci_cells in drivers/mfd/psci-mfd.c, nor
does any code call of_platform_populate() on the PSCI node.
Does this make the newly introduced psci-reboot-mode functionality unreachable
dead code?
> +module_platform_driver(psci_reboot_mode_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PSCI reboot mode driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260714-arm-psci-system_reset2-vendor-reboots-v23-0-e7453c548c21@oss.qualcomm.com?part=7
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.