Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: thermal: loongson,ls2k-thermal: Add compatible for Loongson-2K0300
[email protected] Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:35:42 +0000
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.mfd,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider: - [Medium] The `reg` property loses its strict size constraints for different variants because the explicit `minItems` and `maxItems` bounds were replaced by `items` descriptions inside the `if/then` blocks without restricting the array length. - [Medium] The compatible string added to the syscon schema contains a typo (`cphipid` instead of `chipid`). -- --- Patch [3]: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: thermal: loongson,ls2k-thermal: Add compatible for Loongson-2K0300 --- commit 685d641d1fef4db6e1df5ead93f5d8354f9d319d Author: Binbin Zhou <[email protected]> dt-bindings: thermal: loongson,ls2k-thermal: Add compatible for Loongson-2K0300 This commit adds a new compatible string loongson,ls2k0300-thermal for the thermal sensor on the Loongson-2K0300 SoC. It updates the binding to make loongson,chipid required for this new compatible and restructures the register region constraints for each variant. > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/loongson,ls2k-thermal.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/loongson,ls2k-thermal.yaml > index 79e691b08341c..d312e27737a20 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/loongson,ls2k-thermal.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/loongson,ls2k-thermal.yaml [ ... ] > @@ -34,28 +32,56 @@ properties: > '#thermal-sensor-cells': > const: 1 > > + loongson,chipid: > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle > + description: > + Phandle to the syscon with the Loongson-2K0300 CHIP ID. > + [Severity: Medium] It appears the compatible string added to the syscon schema for this device contains a typo: loongson,ls2k0300-cphipid-syscon instead of chipid. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml: - loongson,ls1b-syscon - loongson,ls1c-syscon - loongson,ls2k0300-cphipid-syscon Given the loongson,chipid property name here and the commit message referencing the chip id, was the cphipid spelling in syscon.yaml unintended? > required: > - compatible > - reg > - interrupts > > -if: > - properties: > - compatible: > - contains: > - enum: > - - loongson,ls2k2000-thermal > +allOf: > + - $ref: /schemas/thermal/thermal-sensor.yaml# > + > + - if: > + properties: > + compatible: > + contains: > + const: loongson,ls2k0300-thermal > + then: > + properties: > + reg: > + items: > + - description: Thermal base register region [Severity: Medium] Does removing the explicit maxItems: 1 constraint here cause a regression where the reg property loses its strict size limits? In JSON Schema and dt-schema, specifying items inside an if/then/properties block does not restrict the maximum array length unless maxItems is explicitly defined. Since the root level allows reg: maxItems: 2, will this configuration mistakenly accept up to two register regions for loongson,ls2k0300-thermal? > + required: > + - loongson,chipid > > -then: > - properties: > - reg: > - minItems: 2 > - maxItems: 2 > + - if: > + properties: > + compatible: > + contains: > + const: loongson,ls2k1000-thermal > + then: > + properties: > + loongson,chipid: false > + reg: > + items: > + - description: Thermal base register region [Severity: Medium] Similarly, does this block also need maxItems: 1 to prevent loongson,ls2k1000-thermal from accepting two register regions? > > -else: > - properties: > - reg: > - maxItems: 1 > + - if: > + properties: > + compatible: > + contains: > + const: loongson,ls2k2000-thermal > + then: > + properties: > + loongson,chipid: false > + reg: > + items: > + - description: Thermal base register region > + - description: Thermal data output register region [Severity: Medium] The previous schema explicitly enforced lengths for loongson,ls2k2000-thermal by stating minItems: 2 and maxItems: 2. Without minItems: 2 here, will dt-schema now accept an incomplete single register region for loongson,ls2k2000-thermal? -- Sashiko AI review ยท https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=3