Re: [PATCH RFC v3 7/7] mfd: ls2kbmc: Capture the reset event of BMC through GPIO
Lee Jones <[email protected]> Sat, 25 Jul 2026 22:10:39 +0100
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.mfd |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 23 Jul 2026, Miao Wang wrote: > Hi, > > > 2026年7月23日 21:11,Lee Jones <[email protected]> 写道: > > > > On Thu, 23 Jul 2026, Miao Wang wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >>> 2026年7月23日 19:29,Lee Jones <[email protected]> 写道: > >>> > >>> On Thu, 09 Jul 2026, [email protected] wrote: > >>> > >>>> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider: > >>>> > >>>> New issues: > >>>> - [High] Unprotected access to `gpio_chip` without a NULL check leads to a potential NULL pointer dereference or use-after-free. > >>>> - [Medium] The ACPI memory resource search for the GPIO controller only checks the first memory descriptor, ignoring any subsequent ones. > >>> > >>> Looks like there are a few of these to consider. > >> > >> Many thanks for your response. I was preparing a v4 to fix the first issue > >> found by the bot. However, I believe that the second issue is false positive, > >> since the memory descriptors (if more than one) in _CRS are ordered and the > >> position is meaningful for the driver. As a result, only checking the first > >> descriptor is acceptable. > >> > >>> > >>> I'm unmarking this for review for now. > >> > >> I still want review for other improvement suggestions. Thanks in advance. > > > > Due to extreme workload, I need a clean or justified Sashiko pass first. > > > So is there any guides that I can refer to to mark for false positives? Most people reply to the feedback and state the fact, with a little background or additional information of course. -- Lee Jones