Re: [PATCH] bus: mhi: host: Flush the posted write after writing to MHI_SOC_RESET_REQ_OFFSET
Jeff Hugo <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jul 2026 15:07:00 -0600
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.mhi,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/23/2026 8:51 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> mhi_soc_reset() tries to reset the device by writing to the
> MHI_SOC_RESET_REQ_OFFSET register. But it doesn't do a read-back to ensure
> that the write gets flushed to the device before returning to the caller.
>
> This may lead to the delay (if implemented) on the caller to be
> insufficient, if the posted write doesn't reach the device before the
> delay.
Interesting. Is the delay tight enough that a few ms will possibly blow
it? Seems like a poorly defined delay. All the devices I'm familiar
with take multiple seconds to boot (with some variability due to ddr
training and thermal constraints), and if the reset triggers a crash
dump, then its easily tens of seconds.
Regardless, since this reset will either kill the pcie link, or
disconnect the SoC from the link for a time, I've been trying to figure
out how this change might break, but I haven't found a scenario, so I
suspect this is good enough.
> So add a read-back after writing to the MHI_SOC_RESET_REQ_OFFSET register.
>
> Fixes: b5a8d233a588 ("bus: mhi: core: Add device hardware reset support")
> Reported-by: Alex Williamson <[email protected]>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
> index 53c0ffe30070..4d458396233a 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
> @@ -170,6 +170,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mhi_get_mhi_state);
>
> void mhi_soc_reset(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl)
> {
> + int __maybe_unused ret;
> + u32 tmp;
> +
> if (mhi_cntrl->reset) {
> mhi_cntrl->reset(mhi_cntrl);
> return;
> @@ -178,6 +181,9 @@ void mhi_soc_reset(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl)
> /* Generic MHI SoC reset */
> mhi_write_reg(mhi_cntrl, mhi_cntrl->regs, MHI_SOC_RESET_REQ_OFFSET,
> MHI_SOC_RESET_REQ);
> + /* Flush the posted write to the device (ignore return value) */
> + ret = mhi_read_reg(mhi_cntrl, mhi_cntrl->regs, MHI_SOC_RESET_REQ_OFFSET,
> + &tmp);
If you wanted, you could fit this all on one line. word wrapping for a
3 char parameter seems a bit silly to me, but I suspect this is highly
subjective.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Hugo <[email protected]>