Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v6 1/3] mptcp: pm: userspace: drop delete_local_addr helper
Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Jul 2026 20:48:32 +0200
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.mptcp |
|---|---|
| Organization | NGI0 Core |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Geliang, On 27/06/2026 00:45, Geliang Tang wrote: > From: Geliang Tang <[email protected]> > > Address entries should not be removed from local_addr_list when a subflow > is deleted by the userspace PM, should only be removed when sending a > REMOVE_ADDR. > > So mptcp_userspace_pm_delete_local_addr() helper shouldn't be called in > mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_create_doit() and mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_destroy_doit(). > > Since this helper is open-coding in mptcp_pm_nl_remove_doit(), it can be > dropped now. > > Address entries are removed from local_addr_list when sending a REMOVE_ADDR > by the userspace PM, the local_addr_used counter of PM should also be > decremented accordingly. I was re-reviewing this series after having read the comments from Sashiko: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected] I think the series is correct, but it feels like additional fixes are required: - msk->pm.userspace_pm_local_addr_list doesn't contain an entry for the ID0 when initialised - That's probably fine, but then it means the ID0 case needs to be handled separately, like it is with the in-kernel PM. - Or maybe easier to add it when the userspace PM is used, to avoid all these exceptions? - If yes, then the remove_doit should no longer handle the ID0 differently as well. - same for announce_doit? - maybe better to do that to avoid all these exceptions? - When creating a subflow with ID0, an entry can be added to the list (to be checked) - If the ID0 is not added at init time, then an exception should be added there - (also there is a check to avoid announcing ID0 → I think it is valid to re-announce the ID0 if this address is no longer used, an exception should be added there too, no?) - each time the list is traversed, it doesn't take into account the ID0 case: - If the ID0 is not added at init time, then an extra check should be added there WDYT? If yes, maybe this kind of patch can help? (not tested) https://github.com/matttbe/mptcp_net-next/commit/e03ee2728e98 Cheers, Matt -- Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.