[PATCH v6 02/24] netfs: Fix missing locking around retry adding new subreqs

David Howells <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.netfs,org.kernel.vger.ceph-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-cifs,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Fix netfs_retry_read_subrequests() and netfs_retry_write_stream() to take
the appropriate lock when adding extra subrequests into
stream->subrequests.

Fixes: e2d46f2ec332 ("netfs: Change the read result collector to only use one work item")
Fixes: 288ace2f57c9 ("netfs: New writeback implementation")
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260425125426.3855807-1-dhowells%40redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells <[email protected]>
cc: Paulo Alcantara <[email protected]>
cc: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
---
 fs/netfs/read_retry.c  | 6 +++++-
 fs/netfs/write_retry.c | 6 +++++-
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/netfs/read_retry.c b/fs/netfs/read_retry.c
index cca9ac43c077..5ec548b996d6 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/read_retry.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/read_retry.c
@@ -175,7 +175,9 @@ static void netfs_retry_read_subrequests(struct netfs_io_request *rreq)
 			list_for_each_entry_safe_from(subreq, tmp,
 						      &stream->subrequests, rreq_link) {
 				trace_netfs_sreq(subreq, netfs_sreq_trace_superfluous);
+				spin_lock(&rreq->lock);
 				list_del(&subreq->rreq_link);
+				spin_unlock(&rreq->lock);
 				netfs_put_subrequest(subreq, netfs_sreq_trace_put_done);
 				if (subreq == to)
 					break;
@@ -203,8 +205,10 @@ static void netfs_retry_read_subrequests(struct netfs_io_request *rreq)
 					     refcount_read(&subreq->ref),
 					     netfs_sreq_trace_new);
 
+			spin_lock(&rreq->lock);
 			list_add(&subreq->rreq_link, &to->rreq_link);
-			to = list_next_entry(to, rreq_link);
+			spin_unlock(&rreq->lock);
+			to = subreq;
 			trace_netfs_sreq(subreq, netfs_sreq_trace_retry);
 
 			stream->sreq_max_len	= umin(len, rreq->rsize);
diff --git a/fs/netfs/write_retry.c b/fs/netfs/write_retry.c
index 29489a23a220..32735abfa03f 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/write_retry.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/write_retry.c
@@ -130,7 +130,9 @@ static void netfs_retry_write_stream(struct netfs_io_request *wreq,
 			list_for_each_entry_safe_from(subreq, tmp,
 						      &stream->subrequests, rreq_link) {
 				trace_netfs_sreq(subreq, netfs_sreq_trace_discard);
+				spin_lock(&wreq->lock);
 				list_del(&subreq->rreq_link);
+				spin_unlock(&wreq->lock);
 				netfs_put_subrequest(subreq, netfs_sreq_trace_put_done);
 				if (subreq == to)
 					break;
@@ -153,8 +155,10 @@ static void netfs_retry_write_stream(struct netfs_io_request *wreq,
 					     netfs_sreq_trace_new);
 			trace_netfs_sreq(subreq, netfs_sreq_trace_split);
 
+			spin_lock(&wreq->lock);
 			list_add(&subreq->rreq_link, &to->rreq_link);
-			to = list_next_entry(to, rreq_link);
+			spin_unlock(&wreq->lock);
+			to = subreq;
 			trace_netfs_sreq(subreq, netfs_sreq_trace_retry);
 
 			stream->sreq_max_len	= len;
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.