Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] rust: bitmap: add contiguous area operations
Yury Norov <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:56:17 -0400
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.nova-gpu,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.rust-for-linux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <amrZcX33BGJCTDMp@yury> |
On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 03:54:13PM +0900, Eliot Courtney wrote: > Add bindings for area operations on bitmaps. Each one is > made safe by adding some extra checks compared to the underlying C code > (for example, checking bounds) and with additional checks to catch > likely erroneous usage if `CONFIG_RUST_BITMAP_HARDENED` is on. > > The C code uses signed integers for some parameters, for example the > length for `__bitmap_set`, so bounds check against i32::MAX. We can't > rely on `BitmapVec::MAX_LEN` because `Bitmap` may not necessarily be > backed by `BitmapVec`. > > Add tests demonstrating the edge cases. > > Signed-off-by: Eliot Courtney <[email protected]> > --- > rust/kernel/bitmap.rs | 194 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 194 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/rust/kernel/bitmap.rs b/rust/kernel/bitmap.rs > index a43bfe0ec3dc..f4b0b8ae39d8 100644 > --- a/rust/kernel/bitmap.rs > +++ b/rust/kernel/bitmap.rs > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ > use crate::bindings; > #[cfg(not(CONFIG_RUST_BITMAP_HARDENED))] > use crate::pr_err; > +use crate::ptr::Alignment; > use core::ptr::NonNull; > > /// Represents a C bitmap. Wraps underlying C bitmap API. Some comments use indicative form in the file, but the imperative 'represent' is a more standard way. Can you please use it instead? > @@ -497,6 +498,116 @@ pub fn next_zero_bit(&self, start: usize) -> Option<usize> { > Some(index) > } > } > + > + /// Finds a contiguous area of `nbits` zero bits at or after `start`, aligned to `align`. > + /// > + /// Returns the bit index of the start of the area, or [`None`] if no such area fitting in > + /// the bitmap exists. > + /// > + /// The returned index is a multiple of `align`. Alignments where `self.len() + align - 1` > + /// overflows a `usize` can hang the underlying C code. > + /// > + /// # Panics > + /// > + /// Panics if CONFIG_RUST_BITMAP_HARDENED is enabled and `start` is out of bounds. > + /// > + /// # Examples > + /// > + /// ``` > + /// use kernel::alloc::{AllocError, flags::GFP_KERNEL}; > + /// use kernel::bitmap::BitmapVec; > + /// use kernel::ptr::Alignment; > + /// > + /// let mut b = BitmapVec::new(64, GFP_KERNEL)?; > + /// let unaligned = Alignment::new::<1>(); > + /// > + /// assert_eq!(Some(0), b.next_zero_area(0, 8, unaligned)); > + /// b.set(0, 5); > + /// assert_eq!(Some(5), b.next_zero_area(0, 8, unaligned)); > + /// assert_eq!(Some(8), b.next_zero_area(0, 8, Alignment::new::<8>())); > + /// assert_eq!(None, b.next_zero_area(0, 65, unaligned)); > + /// # Ok::<(), AllocError>(()) > + /// ``` > + #[inline] > + pub fn next_zero_area(&self, start: usize, nbits: usize, align: Alignment) -> Option<usize> { Please create the rust wrapper next_zero_area_off() around bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(), then in rust create the next_zero_area(), if you need it. > + bitmap_assert!( > + start < self.len(), > + "`start` must be < {}, was {}", > + self.len(), > + start > + ); > + > + let nr = u32::try_from(nbits).ok()?; > + > + // SAFETY: `bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off` is safe to use with an out of bounds `start` > + // value and never reads beyond `self.len()` bits. > + let index = unsafe { > + bindings::bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off( > + self.as_ptr().cast_mut(), > + self.len(), > + start, > + nr, > + align.as_usize() - 1, > + 0, > + ) > + }; > + > + // In case of overflow, we may get back a range outside of what we requested. No, we can't. We've got the test_bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off() for it (in next). If you think the test is incomplete, please extend it. If you believe that bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off() may return something like that, it means the function is buggy, and you shouldn't trust it at all. > + let end = index.checked_add(nbits)?; > + if index < start || index >= self.len() || end > self.len() { > + None > + } else { > + Some(index) > + } So, this should be a simple: (i < len).then_some(i) > + } > + > + /// Sets a contiguous area of `nbits` bits starting at `start`. > + /// > + /// If CONFIG_RUST_BITMAP_HARDENED is not enabled and the area `start..start + nbits` is out of > + /// bounds, does nothing. > + /// > + /// # Panics > + /// > + /// Panics if CONFIG_RUST_BITMAP_HARDENED is enabled and the area `start..start + nbits` is out > + /// of bounds. > + #[inline] > + pub fn set(&mut self, start: usize, nbits: usize) { > + bitmap_assert_return!( > + start > + .checked_add(nbits) > + .is_some_and(|end| end <= self.len() && end <= i32::MAX as usize), > + "Area `start..start + nbits` ({}..{}) must be within bounds {}", > + start, > + start.saturating_add(nbits), > + self.len() > + ); > + // SAFETY: The area `start..start + nbits` is within bounds. Not sure I understand. In the above assertion block you check for it, now you say it's always true... I think, your language should be similar to the find_next_zero_area_off() case: it's safe to call the function with the out-of-bounds start and nbits. > + unsafe { bindings::__bitmap_set(self.as_mut_ptr(), start as u32, nbits as i32) }; > + } > + > + /// Clears a contiguous area of `nbits` bits starting at `start`. > + /// > + /// If CONFIG_RUST_BITMAP_HARDENED is not enabled and the area `start..start + nbits` is out of > + /// bounds, does nothing. > + /// > + /// # Panics > + /// > + /// Panics if CONFIG_RUST_BITMAP_HARDENED is enabled and the area `start..start + nbits` is out > + /// of bounds. > + #[inline] > + pub fn clear(&mut self, start: usize, nbits: usize) { > + bitmap_assert_return!( > + start > + .checked_add(nbits) > + .is_some_and(|end| end <= self.len() && end <= i32::MAX as usize), > + "Area `start..start + nbits` ({}..{}) must be within bounds {}", > + start, > + start.saturating_add(nbits), > + self.len() > + ); > + // SAFETY: The area `start..start + nbits` is within bounds. > + unsafe { bindings::__bitmap_clear(self.as_mut_ptr(), start as u32, nbits as i32) }; > + } > } > > #[cfg(CONFIG_RUST_BITMAP_KUNIT_TEST)] > @@ -614,4 +725,87 @@ fn bitmap_copy_and_extend() -> Result<(), AllocError> { > assert_eq!(Some(17), long_bitmap.last_bit()); > Ok(()) > } > + > + #[test] > + fn bitmap_area_set_clear_find() -> Result<(), AllocError> { > + let mut b = BitmapVec::new(128, GFP_KERNEL)?; > + let unaligned = Alignment::new::<1>(); > + > + assert_eq!(Some(0), b.next_zero_area(0, 5, unaligned)); > + b.set(0, 5); // Now contains {[0, 5)}. > + > + assert_eq!(Some(0), b.next_bit(0)); > + assert_eq!(Some(4), b.next_bit(4)); > + assert_eq!(Some(5), b.next_zero_bit(0)); > + assert_eq!(Some(5), b.next_zero_area(0, 5, unaligned)); > + assert_eq!(Some(8), b.next_zero_area(0, 5, Alignment::new::<8>())); > + > + b.set(8, 8); // Now contains {[0, 5), [8, 16)}. > + assert_eq!(Some(16), b.next_zero_area(0, 4, Alignment::new::<16>())); > + assert_eq!(Some(16), b.next_zero_area(0, 4, unaligned)); > + > + b.clear(0, 5); // Now contains {[8, 16)}. > + assert_eq!(Some(0), b.next_zero_area(0, 5, unaligned)); > + assert_eq!(Some(8), b.next_bit(0)); > + assert_eq!(Some(15), b.last_bit()); > + > + b.clear(16, 0); // Zero-length in-bounds clears are no-ops. > + assert_eq!(Some(8), b.next_bit(0)); > + assert_eq!(Some(15), b.last_bit()); > + > + // A zero-length request returns the first aligned position at or > + // after the next zero bit, even if that position's own bit is set. > + assert_eq!(Some(1), b.next_zero_area(1, 0, unaligned)); > + assert_eq!(Some(8), b.next_zero_area(1, 0, Alignment::new::<8>())); > + > + b.set(60, 10); // Now contains {[8, 16), [60, 70)}. > + assert_eq!(Some(60), b.next_bit(16)); > + assert_eq!(Some(69), b.last_bit()); > + assert_eq!(Some(16), b.next_zero_area(9, 40, unaligned)); > + assert_eq!(Some(70), b.next_zero_area(0, 45, unaligned)); > + > + b.clear(62, 6); // Now contains {[8, 16), [60, 62), [68, 70)}. > + assert_eq!(Some(62), b.next_zero_area(60, 6, unaligned)); > + assert_eq!(Some(61), b.next_bit(61)); > + assert_eq!(Some(69), b.last_bit()); > + > + b.set(64, 0); // Zero-length in-bounds sets are no-ops. > + assert_eq!(Some(62), b.next_zero_bit(62)); > + Ok(()) > + } > + > + #[test] > + fn bitmap_area_exhaustion() -> Result<(), AllocError> { > + let mut b = BitmapVec::new(64, GFP_KERNEL)?; > + let unaligned = Alignment::new::<1>(); > + > + assert_eq!(None, b.next_zero_area(0, 65, unaligned)); > + assert_eq!(None, b.next_zero_area(0, usize::MAX, unaligned)); > + assert_eq!(None, b.next_zero_area(1, usize::MAX, unaligned)); > + > + b.set_bit(0); // Now contains {[0, 1)}. > + assert_eq!(None, b.next_zero_area(0, usize::MAX, unaligned)); > + > + b.set(0, 61); // Now contains {[0, 61)}. > + assert_eq!(None, b.next_zero_area(0, 4, unaligned)); > + assert_eq!(Some(61), b.next_zero_area(0, 3, unaligned)); > + assert_eq!(None, b.next_zero_area(0, 1, Alignment::new::<64>())); > + Ok(()) > + } > + > + #[test] > + #[cfg(not(CONFIG_RUST_BITMAP_HARDENED))] > + fn owned_bitmap_area_out_of_bounds() -> Result<(), AllocError> { > + let mut b = BitmapVec::new(64, GFP_KERNEL)?; > + > + // Should be ignored since out of bounds. > + b.set(64, 4); > + b.set(62, 8); > + b.set(usize::MAX, 0); > + b.clear(usize::MAX, 0); > + b.clear(2048, 8); > + assert_eq!(None, b.next_bit(0)); > + assert_eq!(None, b.next_zero_area(64, 1, Alignment::new::<1>())); > + Ok(()) > + } > } > > -- > 2.55.0