Re: [PATCH 04/17] gpu: nova-core: allocate PCI MSI vector during probe
John Hubbard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.nova-gpu,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/13/26 3:26 PM, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > On Thu Aug 13, 2026 at 11:43 PM CEST, John Hubbard wrote: >> On 8/13/26 2:31 PM, Danilo Krummrich wrote: >>> On Sat Aug 8, 2026 at 5:11 AM CEST, John Hubbard wrote: ... >>> I was about to ask if we really need to bother with MSI and shouln't just go for >>> MSI-X only. >> >> I have an expensive, recent motherboard in my test machine, and it seems to only >> expose MSI for my Turing, Ampere and Blackwell GPUs, in the non-SRIOV configuration. >> So I'm thinking that MSI-X only would not work. > > Interesting, I just checked one of my Ada and one of my Ampere GPUs and neither > reports MSI-X in the capabilities. Other devices show up with MSI-X though... > > Are we sure it's not an endpoint limitation? I really thought it's not. I haven't really dug into it, because it seems very clear that regardless of the answer, we need to support both MSI and MSI-X in nova-core, right? > >>> But then saw that the commit message mentions broken VFIO setups; can you expand >>> on this a bit? Which setups is the commit message referring to? >> >> On Zhi Wang's Big Branch of Everything, he is able to run Windows guests in a >> vGPU VM on top of nova-core. That system requires MSI-X. And I broke it with >> an earlier internal version of this patchset. >> >> That information probably leaked into my commit message here. I can remove >> it. Because I don't think it is based on anything else. > > So I guess we can also drop the INTx fallback? AFAIK SR-IOV VFs won't work with > INTx anyway. > We could drop it. It's there mainly on General Principles, not because today's GPUs use it. thanks, -- John Hubbard