Re: [RFC PATCH v4 13/38] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Support BAR subrange mappings for MWs
Koichiro Den <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.ntb,dev.linux.lists.iommu,org.kernel.vger.dmaengine,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kernel.vger.linux-pci,org.kernel.vger.linux-renesas-soc,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <knk66iqsisdbnk5garkb7773y52xzjojyudf2immryp56ljabn@m3gxtrs5447e> |
On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 03:26:11PM -0500, Frank Li wrote: > On Sun, Jan 18, 2026 at 10:54:15PM +0900, Koichiro Den wrote: > > pci-epf-vntb can pack multiple memory windows into a single BAR using > > mwN_offset. With the NTB core gaining support for programming multiple > > translation ranges for a window, the EPF needs to provide the per-BAR > > subrange layout to the endpoint controller (EPC). > > > > Implement .mw_set_trans_ranges() for pci-epf-vntb. Track subranges for > > each BAR and pass them to pci_epc_set_bar() so EPC drivers can select an > > appropriate inbound mapping mode (e.g. Address Match mode on DesignWare > > controllers) when subrange mappings are required. > > > > Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c | 183 +++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 175 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c > > index 39e784e21236..98128c2c5079 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c > > @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ > > #include <linux/log2.h> > > #include <linux/module.h> > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > +#include <linux/sort.h> > > > > #include <linux/pci-ep-msi.h> > > #include <linux/pci-epc.h> > > @@ -144,6 +145,10 @@ struct epf_ntb { > > > > enum pci_barno epf_ntb_bar[VNTB_BAR_NUM]; > > > > + /* Cache for subrange mapping */ > > + struct ntb_mw_subrange *mw_subrange[MAX_MW]; > > + unsigned int num_subrange[MAX_MW]; > > + > > struct epf_ntb_ctrl *reg; > > > > u32 *epf_db; > > @@ -736,6 +741,7 @@ static int epf_ntb_mw_bar_init(struct epf_ntb *ntb) > > ntb->epf->bar[barno].flags |= upper_32_bits(size) ? > > PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 : > > PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_32; > > + ntb->epf->bar[barno].num_submap = 0; > > > > ret = pci_epc_set_bar(ntb->epf->epc, > > ntb->epf->func_no, > > @@ -1405,28 +1411,188 @@ static int vntb_epf_db_set_mask(struct ntb_dev *ntb, u64 db_bits) > > return 0; > > } > > > > -static int vntb_epf_mw_set_trans(struct ntb_dev *ndev, int pidx, int idx, > > - dma_addr_t addr, resource_size_t size) > > +struct vntb_mw_order { > > + u64 off; > > + unsigned int mw; > > +}; > > + > > +static int vntb_cmp_mw_order(const void *a, const void *b) > > +{ > > + const struct vntb_mw_order *ma = a; > > + const struct vntb_mw_order *mb = b; > > + > > + if (ma->off < mb->off) > > + return -1; > > + if (ma->off > mb->off) > > + return 1; > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int vntb_epf_mw_set_trans_ranges(struct ntb_dev *ndev, int pidx, int idx, > > + unsigned int num_ranges, > > + const struct ntb_mw_subrange *ranges) > > { > > struct epf_ntb *ntb = ntb_ndev(ndev); > > + struct pci_epf_bar_submap *submap; > > + struct vntb_mw_order mws[MAX_MW]; > > struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar; > > + struct ntb_mw_subrange *r; > > enum pci_barno barno; > > + struct device *dev, *epf_dev; > > + unsigned int total_ranges = 0; > > + unsigned int mw_cnt = 0; > > + unsigned int cur = 0; > > + u64 expected_off = 0; > > + unsigned int i, j; > > int ret; > > + > > + dev = &ntb->ntb->dev; > > + epf_dev = &ntb->epf->dev; > > + barno = ntb->epf_ntb_bar[BAR_MW1 + idx]; > > + epf_bar = &ntb->epf->bar[barno]; > > + epf_bar->barno = barno; > > + > > + r = devm_kmemdup(epf_dev, ranges, num_ranges * sizeof(*ranges), GFP_KERNEL); > > size_mul(sizeof(*ranges), num_ranges) Will update. > > > + if (!r) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + if (ntb->mw_subrange[idx]) > > + devm_kfree(epf_dev, ntb->mw_subrange[idx]); > > + > > + ntb->mw_subrange[idx] = r; > > + ntb->num_subrange[idx] = num_ranges; > > + > > + /* Defer pci_epc_set_bar() until all MWs in this BAR have range info. */ > > + for (i = 0; i < MAX_MW; i++) { > > + enum pci_barno bar = ntb->epf_ntb_bar[BAR_MW1 + i]; > > + > > + if (bar != barno) > > + continue; > > + if (!ntb->num_subrange[i]) > > + return 0; > > + > > + mws[mw_cnt].mw = i; > > + mws[mw_cnt].off = ntb->mws_offset[i]; > > + mw_cnt++; > > + } > > + > > + sort(mws, mw_cnt, sizeof(mws[0]), vntb_cmp_mw_order, NULL); > > Can we require mws_offset is ordered? So needn't sort here. Yes, by adding an ordering validation at epf_ntb_bind() time, and documenting the constraint in Documentation/PCI/endpoint/pci-vntb-howto.rst. The sorting was only added for convenience, and there should be no strong technical reason to support arbitrary MW ordering. Thanks for the review. Koichiro > > > + > > + /* BAR submap must cover the whole BAR with no holes. */ > > + for (i = 0; i < mw_cnt; i++) { > > + unsigned int mw = mws[i].mw; > > + u64 sum = 0; > > + > > + if (mws[i].off != expected_off) { > > can we all use size instead 'off' to keep align with submap? Yes, will rename it. Thanks for the review, Koichiro > > Frank > > + dev_err(dev, > > + "BAR%d: hole/overlap at %#llx (MW%d@%#llx)\n", > > + barno, expected_off, mw + 1, mws[i].off); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + total_ranges += ntb->num_subrange[mw]; > > + for (j = 0; j < ntb->num_subrange[mw]; j++) > > + sum += ntb->mw_subrange[mw][j].size; > > + > > + if (sum != ntb->mws_size[mw]) { > > + dev_err(dev, > > + "MW%d: ranges size %#llx != window size %#llx\n", > > + mw + 1, sum, ntb->mws_size[mw]); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + expected_off += ntb->mws_size[mw]; > > + } > > + > > + submap = devm_krealloc_array(epf_dev, epf_bar->submap, total_ranges, > > + sizeof(*submap), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!submap) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + epf_bar->submap = submap; > > + epf_bar->num_submap = total_ranges; > > + dev_dbg(dev, "Requesting BAR%d layout (#. of subranges is %u):\n", > > + barno, total_ranges); > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < mw_cnt; i++) { > > + unsigned int mw = mws[i].mw; > > + > > + dev_dbg(dev, "- MW%d\n", 1 + mw); > > + for (j = 0; j < ntb->num_subrange[mw]; j++) { > > + dev_dbg(dev, " - addr/size = %#llx/%#llx\n", > > + ntb->mw_subrange[mw][j].addr, > > + ntb->mw_subrange[mw][j].size); > > + submap[cur].phys_addr = ntb->mw_subrange[mw][j].addr; > > + submap[cur].size = ntb->mw_subrange[mw][j].size; > > + cur++; > > + } > > + } > > + > > + ret = pci_epc_set_bar(ntb->epf->epc, ntb->epf->func_no, > > + ntb->epf->vfunc_no, epf_bar); > > + if (ret) > > + dev_err(dev, "BAR%d: failed to program mappings for MW%d: %d\n", > > + barno, idx + 1, ret); > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > +static int vntb_epf_mw_set_trans(struct ntb_dev *ndev, int pidx, int idx, > > + dma_addr_t addr, resource_size_t size) > > +{ > > + struct epf_ntb *ntb = ntb_ndev(ndev); > > + struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar; > > + resource_size_t bar_size; > > + enum pci_barno barno; > > struct device *dev; > > + unsigned int i; > > + int ret; > > > > dev = &ntb->ntb->dev; > > barno = ntb->epf_ntb_bar[BAR_MW1 + idx]; > > epf_bar = &ntb->epf->bar[barno]; > > epf_bar->phys_addr = addr; > > epf_bar->barno = barno; > > - epf_bar->size = size; > > > > - ret = pci_epc_set_bar(ntb->epf->epc, 0, 0, epf_bar); > > - if (ret) { > > - dev_err(dev, "failure set mw trans\n"); > > - return ret; > > + bar_size = epf_bar->size; > > + if (!bar_size || !size) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if (size != ntb->mws_size[idx]) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + /* > > + * Even if the caller intends to map the entire MW, the MW might > > + * actually be just a part of the BAR. In that case, redirect the > > + * handling to vntb_epf_mw_set_trans_ranges(). > > + */ > > + if (size < bar_size) { > > + struct ntb_mw_subrange r = { > > + .addr = addr, > > + .size = size, > > + }; > > + return vntb_epf_mw_set_trans_ranges(ndev, pidx, idx, 1, &r); > > } > > - return 0; > > + > > + /* Drop any stale cache for the BAR. */ > > + for (i = 0; i < MAX_MW; i++) { > > + if (ntb->epf_ntb_bar[BAR_MW1 + i] != barno) > > + continue; > > + devm_kfree(&ntb->epf->dev, ntb->mw_subrange[i]); > > + ntb->mw_subrange[i] = NULL; > > + ntb->num_subrange[i] = 0; > > + } > > + > > + /* Not use subrange mapping. If it's used in the past, clear it off. */ > > + devm_kfree(&ntb->epf->dev, epf_bar->submap); > > + epf_bar->submap = NULL; > > + epf_bar->num_submap = 0; > > + > > + ret = pci_epc_set_bar(ntb->epf->epc, ntb->epf->func_no, > > + ntb->epf->vfunc_no, epf_bar); > > + if (ret) > > + dev_err(dev, "failure set mw trans\n"); > > + > > + return ret; > > } > > > > static int vntb_epf_mw_clear_trans(struct ntb_dev *ntb, int pidx, int idx) > > @@ -1590,6 +1756,7 @@ static const struct ntb_dev_ops vntb_epf_ops = { > > .db_vector_mask = vntb_epf_db_vector_mask, > > .db_set_mask = vntb_epf_db_set_mask, > > .mw_set_trans = vntb_epf_mw_set_trans, > > + .mw_set_trans_ranges = vntb_epf_mw_set_trans_ranges, > > .mw_clear_trans = vntb_epf_mw_clear_trans, > > .peer_mw_get_addr = vntb_epf_peer_mw_get_addr, > > .link_enable = vntb_epf_link_enable, > > -- > > 2.51.0 > >