[PATCH 03/10] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Report 0-based doorbell vector via ntb_db_event()

ntb_db_event() expects the vector number to be relative to the first
doorbell vector starting at 0.

pci-epf-vntb reserves vector 0 for link events and uses higher vector
indices for doorbells. By passing the raw slot index to ntb_db_event(),
it effectively assumes that doorbell 0 maps to vector 1.

However, because the host uses a legacy slot layout and writes doorbell
0 into the third slot, doorbell 0 ultimately appears as vector 2 from
the NTB core perspective.

Adjust pci-epf-vntb to:
  - skip the unused second slot, and
  - report doorbells as 0-based vectors (DB#0 -> vector 0).

This change does not introduce a behavioral difference until
.db_vector_count()/.db_vector_mask() are implemented, because without
those callbacks NTB clients effectively ignore the vector number.

Fixes: e35f56bb0330 ("PCI: endpoint: Support NTB transfer between RC and EP")
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
index c00898ac8269..cbce50afc4dc 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
@@ -266,10 +266,10 @@ static void epf_ntb_cmd_handler(struct work_struct *work)
 
 	ntb = container_of(work, struct epf_ntb, cmd_handler.work);
 
-	for (i = 1; i < ntb->db_count && !ntb->msi_doorbell; i++) {
+	for (i = 2; i < ntb->db_count && !ntb->msi_doorbell; i++) {
 		if (ntb->epf_db[i]) {
-			atomic64_or(1 << (i - 1), &ntb->db);
-			ntb_db_event(&ntb->ntb, i);
+			atomic64_or(1 << (i - 2), &ntb->db);
+			ntb_db_event(&ntb->ntb, i - 2);
 			ntb->epf_db[i] = 0;
 		}
 	}
@@ -335,10 +335,10 @@ static irqreturn_t epf_ntb_doorbell_handler(int irq, void *data)
 	struct epf_ntb *ntb = data;
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = 1; i < ntb->db_count; i++)
+	for (i = 2; i < ntb->db_count; i++)
 		if (irq == ntb->epf->db_msg[i].virq) {
-			atomic64_or(1 << (i - 1), &ntb->db);
-			ntb_db_event(&ntb->ntb, i);
+			atomic64_or(1 << (i - 2), &ntb->db);
+			ntb_db_event(&ntb->ntb, i - 2);
 		}
 
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
-- 
2.51.0