Re: [PATCH 4/6] mm: reintroduce vma_flags_test() as a singular flag test

On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 02:57:22PM +0000, Pedro Falcato wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 10:50:17AM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) wrote:
> > Since we've now renamed vma_flags_test() to vma_flags_test_any() to be very
> > clear as to what we are in fact testing, we now have the opportunity to
> > bring vma_flags_test() back, but for explicitly testing a single VMA flag.
> >
> > This is useful, as often flag tests are against a single flag, and
> > vma_flags_test_any(flags, VMA_READ_BIT) reads oddly and potentially causes
> > confusion.
> >
> > We use sparse to enforce that users won't accidentally pass vm_flags_t to
> > this function without it being flagged so this should make it harder to get
> > this wrong.
> >
> > Of course, passing vma_flags_t to the function is impossible, as it is a
> > struct.
> >
> > Also update the VMA tests to reflect this change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) <[email protected]>
>
> Reviewed-by: Pedro Falcato <[email protected]>
>
> This is a lot nicer, though I am wondering if there is any difference in
> codegen as well...

Not that I could tell, this was more about cromulence.

>
> --
> Pedro

Thanks, Lorenzo