Re: [PATCH v2] fs/ntfs3: bound NTFS_DE view.data_off in UpdateRecordData{Root,Allocation}
Konstantin Komarov <[email protected]> Tue, 9 Jun 2026 09:57:28 +0200
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.ntfs3,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5/19/26 11:51, Michael Bommarito wrote: > In do_action()'s UpdateRecordDataRoot (fslog.c:3489) and > UpdateRecordDataAllocation (fslog.c:3697) cases, the memmove > destination is `Add2Ptr(e, le16_to_cpu(e->view.data_off))`, > where e->view.data_off comes from an on-disk NTFS_DE inside > an INDEX_ROOT or INDEX_BUFFER. Neither case validates > view.data_off + dlen against e->size; the existing > check_if_index_root / check_if_alloc_index helpers walk the > entry chain and validate the entry's offset, but not its > internal view fields. > > The neighbouring read sites (e.g., fs/ntfs3/index.c when > iterating view entries) check view.data_off + view.data_size > <= e->size. Apply the same bound at the two memmove sites. > > Reproduced under UML+KASAN on mainline 8d90b09e6741 via > pr_warn-only probe instrumentation: with view.data_off forced > to 0xFFFC, the memmove writes 32 bytes past the end of the > NTFS_DE. > > This is similar in shape to Pavitra Jha's 2026-05-02 patch > "fs/ntfs3: prevent oob in case UpdateRecordDataRoot" > (<[email protected]>) which > proposes calling ntfs3_bad_de_range(); that helper does not > exist in mainline. This patch uses inline checks. > > Fixes: b46acd6a6a62 ("fs/ntfs3: Add NTFS journal") > Cc: [email protected] > Reported-by: Pavitra Jha <[email protected]> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/ntfs3/[email protected]/ > Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-7 > Signed-off-by: Michael Bommarito <[email protected]> > --- > v2: > - Add Pavitra Jha's Reported-by trailer and a Closes tag for > the original public report, as requested in review. > > fs/ntfs3/fslog.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/ntfs3/fslog.c b/fs/ntfs3/fslog.c > index acfa18b84401e..127860fd2ab50 100644 > --- a/fs/ntfs3/fslog.c > +++ b/fs/ntfs3/fslog.c > @@ -3497,6 +3497,18 @@ static int do_action(struct ntfs_log *log, struct OPEN_ATTR_ENRTY *oe, > > e = Add2Ptr(attr, le16_to_cpu(lrh->attr_off)); > > + /* > + * e->view.data_off and dlen come from the on-disk > + * INDEX_ROOT entry / LRH. The neighbouring read sites > + * (e.g. fs/ntfs3/index.c) check that > + * view.data_off + view.data_size <= e->size; mirror that > + * bound here so the memmove cannot reach past the entry. > + */ > + if (le16_to_cpu(e->view.data_off) > le16_to_cpu(e->size) || > + le16_to_cpu(e->view.data_off) + dlen > > + le16_to_cpu(e->size)) > + goto dirty_vol; > + > memmove(Add2Ptr(e, le16_to_cpu(e->view.data_off)), data, dlen); > > mi->dirty = true; > @@ -3689,6 +3701,12 @@ static int do_action(struct ntfs_log *log, struct OPEN_ATTR_ENRTY *oe, > goto dirty_vol; > } > > + /* See UpdateRecordDataRoot for the rationale. */ > + if (le16_to_cpu(e->view.data_off) > le16_to_cpu(e->size) || > + le16_to_cpu(e->view.data_off) + dlen > > + le16_to_cpu(e->size)) > + goto dirty_vol; > + > memmove(Add2Ptr(e, le16_to_cpu(e->view.data_off)), data, dlen); > > a_dirty = true; Hello, Your patch was applied, thank you. Regards, Konstantin