Re: [PATCH 2/2] iomap: submit read bio after each extent
Joanne Koong <[email protected]> Tue, 23 Jun 2026 10:29:54 -0700
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.ntfs3,dev.linux.lists.fuse-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs,org.ozlabs.lists.linux-erofs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJnrk1agx-qUizNzCnzvZ6Marf7u-K4EtKOak4c2MQN1sJfgNA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 6:52 AM Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote: > > Currently the iomap buffered read path tries to build up read context > (i.e. bios for the typical block based case) over multiple iomaps as > long as the sector matches. This does not take into account files > that can map to multiple different devices. While this could be fixed > by a bdev check in iomap_bio_read_folio_range, the building up of I/O > over iomaps actually was a problem for the not yet merged ext2 iomap > port, as that does want to send out I/O at the end of an indirect > block mapped range. > > So instead of adding more checks move over to a model where a bio only > spans a single iomap. Change ->submit_read to be called after each > iteration, and pass a force argument to indicate that the bio must > be submitted set on the last iteration. Switch the bio based users > to always submit, while keeping the single submit for fuse. > > Fixes: dfeab2e95a75 ("erofs: add multiple device support") > Reported-by: Kelu Ye <[email protected]> > Reported-by: Yifan Zhao <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> > --- > fs/exfat/iomap.c | 4 ++-- > fs/fuse/file.c | 6 +++++- > fs/iomap/bio.c | 11 +++++++---- > fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 23 +++++++++++++++-------- > fs/ntfs/aops.c | 4 ++-- > fs/ntfs3/inode.c | 4 ++-- > fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 5 +++-- > include/linux/iomap.h | 5 +++-- > 8 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/iomap/bio.c b/fs/iomap/bio.c > index 0f31e35567b4..f71aaaf60301 100644 > --- a/fs/iomap/bio.c > +++ b/fs/iomap/bio.c > @@ -79,7 +79,8 @@ u32 iomap_finish_ioend_buffered_read(struct iomap_ioend *ioend) > } > > void iomap_bio_submit_read_endio(const struct iomap_iter *iter, > - struct iomap_read_folio_ctx *ctx, bio_end_io_t end_io) > + struct iomap_read_folio_ctx *ctx, bool force, nit: might simplify things to drop the unused force arg > + bio_end_io_t end_io) > { > struct bio *bio = ctx->read_ctx; > > @@ -87,13 +88,15 @@ void iomap_bio_submit_read_endio(const struct iomap_iter *iter, > if (iter->iomap.flags & IOMAP_F_INTEGRITY) > fs_bio_integrity_alloc(bio); > submit_bio(bio); > + > + ctx->read_ctx = NULL; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_bio_submit_read_endio); > > > diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c > index 8d4806dc46d4..06a216d37548 100644 > --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c > +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c > > @@ -642,12 +649,12 @@ void iomap_read_folio(const struct iomap_ops *ops, > fsverity_readahead(ctx->vi, folio->index, > folio_nr_pages(folio)); > > - while ((ret = iomap_iter(&iter, ops)) > 0) > + while ((ret = iomap_iter(&iter, ops)) > 0) { > + iomap_submit_read(&iter, ctx, false); > iter.status = iomap_read_folio_iter(&iter, ctx, > &bytes_submitted); should the submit_read happen after the iomap_read_folio_iter() / iomap_readahead_iter() instaed of before? From what I see, it looks like iomap_submit_read() would hold the iter state of the next mapping. It seems like in iomap_bio_submit_read_endio(), the iter->iomap.flags would be the next extent's flags instead of the one that needs to be submitted? Thanks, Joanne