Re: [PATCH 2/4] ocfs2: remove empty extent list check in ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec()

On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 05:08:01PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
> The full extent list check is introduced by commit 44acc46d182f, which
> is to avoid NULL pointer dereference if a dirent is not found.
> 
> Reworking the error message to not reference rec. Instead, report
> major_hash being looked up and l_next_free_rec, which naturally covers
> both failure cases (empty extent list and no matching record) without
> needing a separate l_next_free_rec == 0 guard.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <[email protected]>

LGTM
Reviewed-by: Heming Zhao <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 15 +++------------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> index 82e720c8ba32..d94595a49923 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> @@ -835,14 +835,6 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec(struct inode *inode,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) == 0) {
> -		ret = ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
> -				  "Inode %lu has empty extent list at depth %u\n",
> -				  inode->i_ino,
> -				  le16_to_cpu(el->l_tree_depth));
> -		goto out;
> -	}
> -
>  	found = 0;
>  	for (i = le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
>  		rec = &el->l_recs[i];
> @@ -855,10 +847,9 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec(struct inode *inode,
>  
>  	if (!found) {
>  		ret = ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
> -				  "Inode %lu has bad extent record (%u, %u, 0) in btree\n",
> -				  inode->i_ino,
> -				  le32_to_cpu(rec->e_cpos),
> -				  ocfs2_rec_clusters(el, rec));
> +				  "Inode %lu has no extent record for hash %u in btree (next_free_rec %u)\n",
> +				  inode->i_ino, major_hash,
> +				  le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec));
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.3
>