Re: [PATCH v4] ocfs2: fix use-after-free in ocfs2_fault() when VM_FAULT_RETRY
Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.ocfs2-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.stable |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 8 Apr 2026 03:50:17 +0000 tejas bharambe <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > You're right, I missed that scenario. > > The inode can be freed if the file descriptor is closed after mmap() and munmap() races with the fault handler. > > I can do one of the following: > 1. I can skip the trace firing when VM_FAULT_RETRY is set as I did in v1. It was changed to v4 after Joseph's suggestion to keep traces. > 2. If we want to keep traces, we can use ihold()/iput() as shown below: > > ihold(inode); //pin inode > ret = filemap_fault(vmf); > trace_ocfs2_fault(OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_blkno, ...); // safe, refcount held > iput(inode); //release inode > > > Which approach do you prefer? Well, that's down to the ocfs2 maintiners. Me, omitting traces doesn't sound good. But we should consider performance implications - this is a fairly hot path and iget/iput are a little costly. Perhaps there's a way to avoid the iget/iput if tracing isn't enabled. As long as we handle the case where tracing get enabled immediately after we've done the if (tracing enabled) iget() > Thanks, > Tejas > ________________________________________ > From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, April 4, 2026 5:50 PM > To: tejas bharambe <[email protected]> > Cc: Tejas Bharambe <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ocfs2: fix use-after-free in ocfs2_fault() when VM_FAULT_RETRY > > On Sun, 5 Apr 2026 00:30:14 +0000 tejas bharambe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Following is my response for question posted on https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260403035333.136824-1-tejas.bharambe%40outlook.com > > > > > > No. For ocfs2_fault() to be executing, the file must be open and > > the process holds an active file descriptor. The inode's lifetime > > is tied to the file's reference count, which remains held by the > > file descriptor for the duration of the fault handler. munmap() > > can free the VMA (decrementing vm_file's refcount) but cannot > > free the inode as long as the file descriptor is open. The faulting > > thread cannot call close() while it is inside the fault handler, > > so the inode is guaranteed to outlive the trace call. > > I don't think that's the scenario which Sashiko is suggesting. > > Suppose userspace does > > fd = open(...); > p = mmap(fd, ...); > close(fd); > > Now, that mmap is the only ref against fd. > > Now, suppose that userspace does munmap() while another thread is in > the fault handler.