Re: [PATCH v3] ocfs2: free unused clusters on defrag move errors
Joseph Qi <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:16:59 +0800
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.ocfs2-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/21/26 9:15 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jul 2026 22:19:43 +0800 Guangshuo Li <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ocfs2_defrag_extent() claims new clusters before calling >> __ocfs2_move_extent(). If the move fails before ocfs2_split_extent() >> succeeds, the claimed clusters are not referenced by the inode and must >> be released. >> >> The current error path only logs the error and continues to >> ocfs2_cow_sync_writeback(), which can overwrite the original error with >> zero and leave the claimed clusters allocated. >> >> Not every __ocfs2_move_extent() error can free the new clusters. Once >> ocfs2_split_extent() succeeds, the extent tree references them even if >> ocfs2_decrease_refcount() or ocfs2_truncate_log_append() subsequently >> fails. Freeing the clusters in that case would leave the extent tree >> pointing to clusters marked free. >> >> context->new_phys_cpos is updated immediately after a successful extent >> split. Compare it with the newly claimed physical cluster on error. If >> they differ, the split for the current move did not complete and the >> claimed clusters can be freed. If they match, leave the clusters >> allocated because the extent tree already references them. >> >> Return move errors through the transaction cleanup path so that the >> original error is preserved instead of being overwritten by writeback. > > Thanks. AI review has flagged a couple of possible issues with this > change. Please check? > > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected] Thanks sashiko. Yes, it indeed introduces a regression. In data=writeback mode, ocfs2_should_order_data() returns 0, so ocfs2_jbd2_inode_add_write() is never called. The dirty buffers are not flushed at commit, they survive, still mapped to new_block. The patch's need_free path frees new_block immediately. The VM later writes those dirty buffers to new_block at an arbitrary time — after it may have been reallocated to another inode. That's the cross-file corruption. Before this changes, the cluster were leaked, so new_block stayed allocated forever and the stale writeback was harmless. Thanks, Joseph