Re: [PATCH] Connecting the SB600's i8259 controller rather in pasemi's pci.c than in pasemi's setup.c.
Philip Li <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.oe-kbuild-all,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <aoFPwEi0iQRSmmSu@rli9-mobl> |
On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 11:56:56AM +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote: > On 14/08/26 17:42, kernel test robot wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > > > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: > > > > [auto build test WARNING on powerpc/next] > > [also build test WARNING on powerpc/fixes linus/master v7.2-rc7 > next-20260813] > > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in > > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] > > > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-Zigotzky/Connecting-the-SB600-s-i8259-controller-rather-in-pasemi-s-pci-c-than-in-pasemi-s-setup-c/20260813-054214 > > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > >>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/setup.c:217:6: warning: no previous > prototype for function 'nemo_init_IRQ' [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > This is the old patch. Sorry about this meaningless report, we will improve the bot to check new patches to avoid such report. > > Here is the new patch with pasemi.h: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/[email protected]/ > > Thanks > > -- > Sent with BrassMonkey 34.3.1 (https://github.com/chzigotzky/Web-Browsers-and-Suites-for-Linux-PPC/releases/tag/BrassMonkey_34.3.1) > >