Re: [PATCH] selftests/lsm: Fix memory leak in attr_lsm_count

kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.oe-kbuild
Message-ID <[email protected]>
:::::: 
:::::: Manual check reason: "low confidence bisect report"
:::::: 

BCC: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
TO: Wang Yan <[email protected]>
TO: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
CC: Wang Yan <[email protected]>

Hi Wang,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on shuah-kselftest/next]
[also build test WARNING on shuah-kselftest/fixes pcmoore-selinux/next linus/master v7.2-rc7]
[cannot apply to next-20260813]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Wang-Yan/selftests-lsm-Fix-memory-leak-in-attr_lsm_count/20260807-191039
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260703025247.940055-1-wangyan01%40kylinos.cn
patch subject: [PATCH] selftests/lsm: Fix memory leak in attr_lsm_count
:::::: branch date: 7 days ago
:::::: commit date: 7 days ago
config: s390-allnoconfig-bpf (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260814/[email protected]/config)
compiler: s390x-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260814/[email protected]/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   common.c: In function 'attr_lsm_count':
>> common.c:78:9: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
      78 |         if (read_sysfs_lsms(names, sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE)))
         |         ^~
   common.c:80:17: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if'
      80 |                 return 0;
         |                 ^~~~~~

--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.