Re: [PATCH net v2] nfc: digital: fix use-after-free in nfc_digital_unregister_device()
Simon Horman <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Jul 2026 13:10:43 +0100
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.oe-linux-nfc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible. Full review at: https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=1 --- Subject: nfc: digital: fix use-after-free in nfc_digital_unregister_device() This patch replaces cancel_work_sync() with disable_work_sync() on cmd_work and cmd_complete_work in nfc_digital_unregister_device() so that re-arming schedule_work() calls become no-ops before the cmd_queue is freed. > diff --git a/net/nfc/digital_core.c b/net/nfc/digital_core.c > index 7cb1e6aaae90..6def5132a4a6 100644 > --- a/net/nfc/digital_core.c > +++ b/net/nfc/digital_core.c > @@ -843,8 +843,8 @@ void nfc_digital_unregister_device(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev) > mutex_unlock(&ddev->poll_lock); > > cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ddev->poll_work); > - cancel_work_sync(&ddev->cmd_work); > - cancel_work_sync(&ddev->cmd_complete_work); > + disable_work_sync(&ddev->cmd_work); > + disable_work_sync(&ddev->cmd_complete_work); [High] Does this fully close the use-after-free window, or only the workqueue re-arm portion of it? Once digital_wq_cmd() has handed a command to the driver via ops->in_send_cmd(..., digital_send_cmd_complete, cmd), the driver retains a raw pointer to that digital_cmd in its own async machinery (for nfcsim this is dev->recv_work / dev->arg, for real drivers it is URB completions, timers, etc.). disable_work_sync() on cmd_work and cmd_complete_work waits only for those two work items; it does not synchronize the driver's async completion path. When that completion later fires it calls back into digital_send_cmd_complete(): static void digital_send_cmd_complete(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, void *arg, struct sk_buff *resp) { struct digital_cmd *cmd = arg; cmd->resp = resp; schedule_work(&ddev->cmd_complete_work); } The subsequent schedule_work() is correctly a no-op after disable_work_sync(), but the cmd->resp = resp store happens first, on a digital_cmd that the cleanup loop in nfc_digital_unregister_device() may already have kfree()'d. The same reproducer described in the commit message applies: in nfcsim_device_free(), nfc_digital_unregister_device() runs before cancel_work_sync(&dev->recv_work) and before dev->up = false, so a pending dev->recv_work blocked in wait_event can wake up after the queue has been freed and call dev->cb(ddev, dev->arg, skb) with dev->arg pointing at a freed digital_cmd. Elsewhere in this file the pattern for stopping in-flight commands before touching the queue calls digital_abort_cmd(ddev) (see digital_stop_poll(), digital_dep_link_down(), and digital_deactivate_target()), which asks the driver to abort its outstanding commands. Would an equivalent digital_abort_cmd(ddev) in nfc_digital_unregister_device(), before the list_for_each_entry_safe() kfree loop, be needed here as well? The commit message states: Once both works are disabled no work can run, and the cleanup loop frees the queue with no work able to reach a freed command. Is that description accurate given that the driver's completion callback reaches the digital_cmd directly through the arg pointer rather than through cmd_work or cmd_complete_work? This residual issue is pre-existing rather than introduced by the patch, but it seems relevant to the completeness of the fix as described.