Re: [PATCH net v2] nfc: llcp: reject PDUs shorter than the LLCP header
David Laight <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Jul 2026 21:53:02 +0100
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.oe-linux-nfc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kernel.vger.stable |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260714215302.75d8bf72@pumpkin> |
On Tue, 14 Jul 2026 18:46:29 +0200 Doruk Tan Ozturk <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is there a similar problem with non-linear skb? > > Maybe they can't get into this code, but who knows what can happen > > with unusual configs. > > Good question. Today every skb that reaches __nfc_llcp_recv() is > linear: the target path (nci_rx_data_packet -> nci_add_rx_data_frag -> > nfc_tm_data_received) and the initiator path (nfc_data_exchange -> > nfc_llcp_recv) both build the frame with alloc_skb()/nci_skb_alloc() > plus skb_put()/skb_put_data(), and NCI reassembly uses skb_cow_head() > and skb_push() into the linear area. Nothing on the NFC receive side > attaches page frags or a frag_list, so skb->len == skb_headlen() and the > v2 skb->len test was in fact sufficient for the in-tree drivers. > > But relying on that is fragile: the parser reads the header out of the > linear area (pdu->data[0]/data[1]) while skb->len is the total length, > so a non-linear skb with a short linear head would slip past a skb->len > test and still over-read the linear buffer. pskb_may_pull() is the > right guard here -- it also covers the non-linear case, and it matches > how the sibling NCI and HCI receive paths already validate their > headers. > > I will send a v3 that uses: > > if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, LLCP_HEADER_SIZE)) { > kfree_skb(skb); > return; > } > > That is strictly stronger than the v2 check and does not reject any > valid frame -- pskb_may_pull() pulls the two header bytes into the > linear area when needed. Does that help any code further down the rx path? It might be better to drop non-linear packets with a comment that they aren't expected to happen. David > > Thanks, > Doruk