Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] nfc: s3fwrn5: support the S3NRN4V variant
Jorijn van der Graaf <[email protected]> Sun, 19 Jul 2026 20:09:38 +0200
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.oe-linux-nfc,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello David, On 19/07/2026 16:56, David Heidelberg wrote: > now it makes more sense to me, feel free to name it as calibration > data. Will do -- v3 will say "RF calibration data" in the commit message and comments. > I would suggest to introduce something as a calibration-variant (see > ath10k code). > > If I understand right, firmware location path could look like > > default path + driver vendor and model + device vendor and model + > revision > > /lib/firmware/ + Samsung/s3nrn4v/ + Fairphone/FP5/hwrevision.bin That layout makes sense to me. My inclination for v3: - request the files from a chip-scoped directory: samsung/s3nrn4v/hwreg.bin + samsung/s3nrn4v/swreg.bin (the existing parts' sec_s3fwrn5_rfreg.bin is untouched); - an optional samsung,calibration-variant string property (modelled on ath10k's qcom,calibration-variant) that, when set, makes the driver try a device-scoped location first, e.g. samsung/s3nrn4v/fairphone-fp6/hwreg.bin, falling back to the bare files above. The variant lookup can also be added compatibly later, once a second S3NRN4V design (or a diverging FP6 revision) actually appears -- so if you'd rather keep v3 minimal, I'd do only the directory move now and add the property when first needed. Either works for me. So far I have seen no evidence of per-revision or per-region variants on the FP6: the only difference I have identified between my two units' tables is the vendor software release (build-date stamps). But Fairphone would know better. > /cc Luca here, as he may know more about the different configuration > data shipped. Luca, two questions your way: - do FP6 hardware revisions (or regional SKUs) ship different NFC hwreg/swreg tables, or is it one set per software release? - could Fairphone submit these tables to linux-firmware? I assume the redistribution question sits with Fairphone/Samsung, and having them there would make NFC work out of the box on mainline. > We should assume the configuration will be shipped with > linux-firmware at some point. Agreed -- that is exactly why I'd like to settle the path scheme now. v3 is otherwise ready, including the Fairphone 6 DT patch; rather than sending it right away as I said earlier today, I'll give this a few days for Luca's input and then send it. Thanks, Jorijn