Re: [linus:master] [mm] c6307674ed: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/vmalloc.c

On 4/23/26 05:34, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 10:32:16AM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
>>
>> We have added non-sleeping flags for vmalloc() to extend kvmalloc()
>> functionality as folk need those.
>>  
>> Another option, would be: always use vfree_atomic() from the kvfree()
>> path.
>>  
>> Any thoughts?
> 
> Perhaps add a kvfree_atomic that just calls vfree_atomic?

kvfree()'s comment says

" * Context: Either preemptible task context or not-NMI interrupt."

so this is neither. It might be ok then to create kvfree_atomic(). Always
using vfree_atomic() from kvfree() might be wasteful.

> For rhashtable it really makes no difference either way.  But it
> would eliminate the unsightly call to is_vmalloc_addr in rhashtable.
> 
> Thanks,