[tip:core/entry] [x86/entry] 1b1f3b3e1b: kselftests.x86.syscall_numbering_64.fail

kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.oe-lkp,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>

Hello,

kernel test robot noticed "kselftests.x86.syscall_numbering_64.fail" on:

commit: 1b1f3b3e1b3945ae6e49081fd3586a6833d4a555 ("x86/entry: Get rid of the sys_ni_syscall() indirection")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git core/entry


in testcase: kselftests
version: kselftests-x86_64-f5098b6bae76-1_20260727
with following parameters:

	group: x86


config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-kselftests
compiler: gcc-14
test machine: 16 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-13620H (Raptor Lake) with 32G memory

(please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)



If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/[email protected]



The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260806/[email protected]


  836 # timeout set to 300
  837 # selftests: x86: syscall_numbering_64
  838 # [RUN]   Checking for x32 by calling x32 getpid()
  839 # [INFO]      x32 is not supported
  840 # [RUN]   Running tests without ptrace...
  841 # [RUN]       Checking system calls with msb = 0 (0x0)
  842 # [RUN]           Checking some common syscalls as 64 bit
  843 # [OK]                x64 syscall 0:0 returned 0 as expected
  844 # [OK]                x64 syscall 0:1 returned 0 as expected
  845 # [RUN]           Checking some 64-bit only syscalls as 64 bit
  846 # [OK]                x64 syscall 0:19 returned 0 as expected
  847 # [OK]                x64 syscall 0:20 returned 0 as expected

...

 1452 # [RUN]           Checking out of range system calls
 1453 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall 0:-64 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS
 1454 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall 0:-63 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS
 1455 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall 0:-62 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS
 1456 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall 0:-61 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS
 1457 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall 0:-60 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS
 1458 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall 0:-59 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS
 1459 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall 0:-58 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS

... <huge number of these stuffs>

until ...

39542 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall -2147483647:996 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS
39543 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall -2147483647:997 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS
39544 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall -2147483647:998 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS
39545 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall -2147483647:999 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS
39546 # [FAIL]              x32 syscalls -2147483647:0..999 had 1000 failure
39547 # [FAIL]  A total of 37800 system calls had incorrect behavior
39548 not ok 18 selftests: x86: syscall_numbering_64 # exit=1


details in attached kselftests-1b1f3b3e1b.xz


-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
kselftests-1b1f3b3e1b.xz (application/x-xz, 20.7 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.