Re: [linus:master] [x86/bugs] a3af84b0fa: stress-ng.seccomp.ops_per_sec 95.7% regression
Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.oe-lkp,org.kernel.vger.bpf,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/18/26 23:20, kernel test robot wrote: > kernel test robot noticed a 95.7% regression of stress-ng.seccomp.ops_per_sec on: One one level this is a "vulnerability mitigations cause performance loss, news at 11" kind of thing. Like, Duh! The microbenchmark here does seem to be a pretty worse-case scenario where it sits in a loop loading and running a seccomp filter program. In other words, it's just about as pathological of a test as you can have. I think Pawan had some more ideas about ways to optimize this. Is there any appetite for that? Or is the test just too synthetic to worry about?