Re: Quectel EC21 with internal GSM MUX
Denis Kenzior <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Oct 2025 08:56:06 -0500
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.ofono |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Martin, On 10/6/25 8:15 AM, Martin Hundebøll wrote: > On Thu, 2025-09-25 at 14:55 +0000, Christian Meusel wrote: > > <snip> > >> Sep 25 14:45:48 target ofonod[4030]: >> ../../../../../../workspace/sources/ofono/plugins/quectel.c:ate_cb() >> 0x4f6400 >> Sep 25 14:45:48 target ofonod[4030]: at_chat_send_common: >> enqueued "AT+CMUX=0,0,5,127,10,3,30,10,2", len is 1 >> Sep 25 14:45:48 target ofonod[4030]: UART: > >> AT+CMUX=0,0,5,127,10,3,30,10,2\r >> Sep 25 14:45:48 target ofonod[4030]: UART: < \r\n >> Sep 25 14:45:48 target ofonod[4030]: UART: < OK\r\n >> Sep 25 14:45:48 target ofonod[4030]: >> ../../../../../../workspace/sources/ofono/plugins/quectel.c:cmux_cb() >> 0x4f6400 >> Sep 25 14:45:49 target ofonod[4030]: >> ../../../../../../workspace/sources/ofono/src/modem.c:get_modem_prope >> rty() modem 0x4f6400 property Mux >> Sep 25 14:45:49 target ofonod[4030]: >> ../../../../../../workspace/sources/ofono/plugins/quectel.c:cmux_acti >> vation_delay_cb() 0x4f6400 >> Sep 25 14:45:49 target ofonod[4030]: >> ../../../../../../workspace/sources/ofono/plugins/quectel.c:cmux_gatm >> ux() 0x4f6400 >> Sep 25 14:45:49 target ofonod[4030]: >> ../../../../../../workspace/sources/ofono/plugins/quectel.c:create_ch >> at() 0x4f6400 >> Sep 25 14:45:49 target ofonod[4030]: >> ../../../../../../workspace/sources/ofono/plugins/quectel.c:create_ch >> at() 0x4f6400 >> Sep 25 14:45:49 target ofonod[4030]: >> ../../../../../../workspace/sources/ofono/plugins/quectel.c:identify_ >> model() 0x4f6400 >> Sep 25 14:45:49 target ofonod[4030]: at_chat_send_common: >> enqueued "AT+CGMM", len is 1 >> Sep 25 14:45:49 target ofonod[4030]: Aux: > AT+CGMM\r >> Sep 25 14:45:49 target ofonod[4030]: Aux: < >> \r\nEC21\r\n\r\nOK\r\n >> Sep 25 14:45:49 target ofonod[4030]: >> ../../../../../../workspace/sources/ofono/plugins/quectel.c:cgmm_cb() >> 0x4f6400 ok 1 >> Sep 25 14:45:49 target ofonod[4030]: >> ../../../../../../workspace/sources/ofono/plugins/quectel.c:cgmm_cb() >> 0x4f6400 model EC21 >> Sep 25 14:45:49 target ofonod[4030]: >> ../../../../../../workspace/sources/ofono/plugins/quectel.c:setup_aux >> () 0x4f6400 >> Sep 25 14:45:49 target ofonod[4030]: at_chat_send_common: >> enqueued "ATE0; &C0; +CMEE=1", len is 1 >> Sep 25 14:45:49 target ofonod[4030]: at_chat_send_common: >> enqueued "AT+QURCCFG="urcport","uart1"", len is 2 >> Sep 25 14:45:49 target ofonod[4030]: at_chat_send_common: >> enqueued "AT+CFUN?", len is 3 >> Sep 25 14:45:49 target ofonod[4030]: Aux: > ATE0; &C0; +CMEE=1\r >> Sep 25 14:45:49 target ofonod[4030]: Aux: < \r\nOK\r\n >> Sep 25 14:45:54 target ofonod[4030]: Aux: < \r\nNORMAL POWER >> DOWN\r\n >> Sep 25 14:45:54 target ofonod[4030]: Modem: < \r\nPOWERED >> DOWN\r\n >> Sep 25 14:45:54 target ofonod[4030]: Aux: < \r\nPOWERED DOWN\r\n > > I think these "POWER" notification from the modem are the culprit. We > carry the attached patch in our setup to avoid those messages stalling > the AT parser. But they come exactly 5 seconds after the initial power up sequence. > > I must admit that past me would have written a better commit message, > but here we are :/ But these URCs seem fine? They have both initial and trailing \r\n and no trailing spaces? > > With that said: Why does the modem choose to power down? Is > someone/something toggling the power-up GPIO to the modem? The 5 second timing is suspicious. oFono core does set a timer and will invoke a .disable() if .enable() doesn't succeed in a given time. But the default timeout is 20 seconds (see src/modem.c DEFAULT_POWERED_TIMEOUT) Regards, -Denis