Re: [PATCH v11 1/8] Landlock: Add abstract UNIX socket restriction

On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 06:13:55PM -0600, Tahera Fahimi wrote:
> This patch introduces a new "scoped" attribute to the
> landlock_ruleset_attr that can specify
> "LANDLOCK_SCOPED_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET" to scope abstract UNIX sockets
> from connecting to a process outside of the same Landlock domain. It
> implements two hooks, unix_stream_connect and unix_may_send to enforce
> this restriction.
> 
> Closes: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/7
> Signed-off-by: Tahera Fahimi <[email protected]>

> diff --git a/security/landlock/task.c b/security/landlock/task.c
> index 849f5123610b..b9390445d242 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/task.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/task.c

> +static int hook_unix_stream_connect(struct sock *const sock,
> +				    struct sock *const other,
> +				    struct sock *const newsk)
> +{
> +	const struct landlock_ruleset *const dom =
> +		landlock_get_current_domain();
> +
> +	/* quick return for non-sandboxed processes */
> +	if (!dom)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (is_abstract_socket(other) && sock_is_scoped(other, dom))
> +		return -EPERM;

I was wondering if it would make more sense to return -EACCES here.
EACCES is usually related to file permission, but send(2)/sendto(2)
don't return EPERM according to man pages.  Well, according to the
kernel code they can return EPERM so I think we are good with EPERM.

It looks like other LSMs always use EACCES though...

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int hook_unix_may_send(struct socket *const sock,
> +			      struct socket *const other)
> +{
> +	const struct landlock_ruleset *const dom =
> +		landlock_get_current_domain();
> +
> +	if (!dom)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (is_abstract_socket(other->sk)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Checks if this datagram socket was already allowed to
> +		 * be connected to other.
> +		 */
> +		if (unix_peer(sock->sk) == other->sk)
> +			return 0;
> +
> +		if (sock_is_scoped(other->sk, dom))
> +			return -EPERM;

ditto