Re: Confirmation on next steps for contribution
Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.outreachy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025, Samuel Abraham wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 5:57 PM Julia Lawall <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 26 Mar 2025, Samuel Abraham wrote: > > > > > Hello Julia, > > > > > > I hope you are having a great day. > > > I just wanted to confirm the next steps for our contribution. > > > Do we send more clean-up patches and how many accepted ones > > > should we have before we can move forward? > > > > Previously we asked for 20, but there are not that many opportunities at > > the moment, so I would say 5. Basically, you should get your patches > > acepted on the first try. And try to look around to find more interesting > > Okay thank you for your response. > So do you mean we should try to get our patches accepted with > the very first version we send? Like it should be accepted without any > corrections? Yes. > > Also how do we know when a patch has been accepted. Is it when the "Reviewed-by" > tag has been added by a reviewer? When it is in Greg's git tree. julia > > things to do. How does the code look different from other Linux kernel > > code? > > > > I will post some more pointers to suggested cleanups on the weekend. > > Okay thank you for this > > Adekunle. >