Re: [PATCH 2/5] staging: rtl8723bs: replace kmalloc + memset with kzalloc
Julia Lawall <[email protected]> Mon, 31 Mar 2025 21:05:46 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.outreachy,dev.linux.lists.linux-staging,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 31 Mar 2025, Erick Karanja wrote: > Replace a call to kmalloc followed by memset with a single call to > kzalloc, which both allocates memory and zeroes it in one step. > > This change improves readability and reduces redundant code. > > Signed-off-by: Erick Karanja <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/osdep_service.c | 7 +------ > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/osdep_service.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/osdep_service.c > index a00f9f0c85c5..be46132a533a 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/osdep_service.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/osdep_service.c > @@ -24,12 +24,7 @@ void *_rtw_malloc(u32 sz) > > void *_rtw_zmalloc(u32 sz) > { > - void *pbuf = _rtw_malloc(sz); > - > - if (pbuf) > - memset(pbuf, 0, sz); > - > - return pbuf; > + return kzalloc(sz, in_interrupt() ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL); > } So _rtw_malloc calls kmalloc? How about gettind rid of both _rtw_malloc and _rtw_zmalloc and calling kmalloc and kzalloc instead? You should try to figure out if GFP_ATOMIC or GFP_KERNEL should be used based on the context. If you search for those constants, you should be able to find some explanations about when they should be used. julia > > inline struct sk_buff *_rtw_skb_alloc(u32 sz) > -- > 2.43.0 > > >