Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: rtl8723bs: Modify struct rx_pkt_attrib attribute bdecrypted
Erick Karanja <[email protected]> Fri, 04 Apr 2025 09:58:23 +0300
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.outreachy,dev.linux.lists.linux-staging,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 21:41 +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 10:34:22PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2 Apr 2025, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 08:16:42PM +0300, Erick Karanja wrote: > > > > Standardize boolean representation by ensuring consistency, > > > > replace instances of 1/0 with true/false where boolean logic is > > > > implied, > > > > as some definitions already use true/false. > > > > This improves code clarity and aligns with the kernel’s bool > > > > type usage. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Erick Karanja <[email protected]> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c > > > > b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c > > > > index a389ba5ecc6f..fd04dbacb50f 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c > > > > @@ -1358,7 +1358,7 @@ static signed int > > > > validate_80211w_mgmt(struct adapter *adapter, union recv_frame > > > > u8 *mgmt_DATA; > > > > u32 data_len = 0; > > > > > > > > - pattrib->bdecrypted = 0; > > > > + pattrib->bdecrypted = false; > > > > > > but bdecrypted is a u8, not a boolean type. So setting it to > > > "false" > > > does not seem correct here, right? > > > > Is false different than 0? > > Does C guarantee that? I can never remember. I don't think it > guarantees that a 'bool' will only be 8 bits, or am I mistaken there > too? > > > Elsewhere there is an assignment to true. > > Was that in the original driver? > > If this doesn't come from the hardware, then it's fine to make the > change. If it does, it needs to be verified that the layout and bit > values are identical. > > thanks, I have compared the generated assembly code before and after and I have observed the only change is the comment below. -# drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c:1361: pattrib->bdecrypted = 0; +# drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c:1361: pattrib->bdecrypted = false; There is no change in the assembly instructions. > > greg k-h