Re: [PATCH v3] staging: rtl8723bs: Use % 4096u instead of & 0xfff

Samuel Abraham <[email protected]> Mon, 7 Apr 2025 07:32:18 +0100
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.outreachy,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <CADYq+fZzzJTEvhbO9y=i2DA7fH_99ofcG-PZHP_7LR1pyhympA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 6:10 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 12:27:53AM +0000, Abraham Samuel Adekunle wrote:
> > The sequence number is constrained to a range of [0, 4095], which
> > is a total of 4096 values. The bitmask operation using `0xfff` is
> > used to perform this wrap-around. While this is functionally correct,
> > it obscures the intended semantic of a 4096-based wrap.
> >
> > Using a modulo operation with `4096u` makes the wrap-around logic
> > explicit and easier to understand. It clearly signals that the sequence
> > number cycles though a range of 4096 values.
> >
> > The use of `4096u` also guarantees that the modulo operation is performed
> > with unsigned arithmetic, preventing potential issues with signed types.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
> > David Laight <[email protected]>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Abraham Samuel Adekunle <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> >       - Changed the commit message to a more descriptive message which
> >       makes it clear why the patch does the change.
> >       - Changed the subject title to include `4096u` to show that an unsigned
> >       module is used.
> > Changes in v1:
> >       - Added more patch recipients.
> >
> >  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c | 6 +++---
>
> Any specific reason you did not include the staging mailing list like
> scripts/get_maintainers.pl asks you to?

Thank you, Greg.
I have sent an updated patch.

Adekunle