Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Add white spaces around binary operators
Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Tue, 8 Apr 2025 12:35:05 +0300
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.outreachy,dev.linux.lists.linux-staging,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 10:22:44AM +0100, Samuel Abraham wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 8:20 AM Andy Shevchenko > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 12:54 AM Abraham Samuel Adekunle > > <[email protected]> wrote: ... > > > - psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] = (tx_seq+1)&0xfff; > > > + psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] = (tx_seq + 1) & 0xfff; > > > > > - psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] = (pattrib->seqnum+1)&0xfff; > > > + psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] = (pattrib->seqnum + 1) & 0xfff; > > > > You mentioned Linux coding style, which also requires lines not to be > > so long. These lines are. That's why a few versions ago I suggested > > you to change these to be two lines each. I don't know how many times > > to repeat this (it's third one). > > Okay, sorry > I will add a third patch for a line break before the patch for % > operations since each patch should handle a single thing. I am not sure you need a third patch for that. It lies into category of space and indentation fix. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko