Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Add white spaces around binary operators

On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 11:36=E2=80=AFAM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro=
.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 12:35:05PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 10:22:44AM +0100, Samuel Abraham wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 8:20=E2=80=AFAM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 12:54=E2=80=AFAM Abraham Samuel Adekunle
> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > > -                                               psta->BA_starting=
_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] =3D (tx_seq+1)&0xfff;
> > > > > +                                               psta->BA_starting=
_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] =3D (tx_seq + 1) & 0xfff;
> > > >
> > > > > -                                               psta->BA_starting=
_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] =3D (pattrib->seqnum+1)&0xfff;
> > > > > +                                               psta->BA_starting=
_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] =3D (pattrib->seqnum + 1) & 0xfff;
> > > >
> > > > You mentioned Linux coding style, which also requires lines not to =
be
> > > > so long. These lines are. That's why a few versions ago I suggested
> > > > you to change these to be two lines each. I don't know how many tim=
es
> > > > to repeat this (it's third one).
> > >
> > > Okay, sorry
> > > I will add a third patch for a line break before the patch for %
> > > operations since each patch should handle a single thing.
> >
> > I am not sure you need a third patch for that. It lies into category of=
 space
> > and indentation fix.
> >
>
> Yeah.  Let's not go crazy.  Do the white space change as one patch.  The
> rules are there to make reviewing easier.  Splitting it up into three
> patches doesn't help anyone.

Okay thank you Dan. I have collapsed the spaces and linebreaks into one pat=
ch

>
> In staging we say, "Fix one type of checkpatch warning at a time."
> That's because it's a simple rule to explain and it stops people from
> sending us huge patches that fix every checkpatch warning.  But this
> patch is small and everything is related and it's easy to review.
>
Thank you very much for the clarity. I understand now.

I already asked Andy, but I would also like to seek your opinion on
how I should version
the next patch. I already made this current one v6. Do I send v7 with
changes in the cover letter,
or changes in the individual patches?
Or what is the best way please

Thanks

Adekunle.