[PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: Replace `& 0xfff` with `% 4096u`

The sequence number is constrained to a range of [0, 4095], which
is a total of 4096 values. The bitmask operation using `& 0xfff` is
used to perform this wrap-around. While this is functionally correct,
it obscures the intended semantic of a 4096-based wrap.

Using a modulo operation `% 4096u` makes the wrap-around logic
explicit and easier to understand. It clearly signals that the
sequence number cycles through a range of 4096 values.
It also makes the code robust against potential changes of the 4096
upper limit, especially when it becomes a non power-of-2 value while
the AND(&) works solely for power-of-2 values.

The use of `% 4096u` also guarantees that the modulo operation is
performed with unsigned arithmetic, preventing potential issues with
the signed types.

Found by Coccinelle.

Suggested by Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abraham Samuel Adekunle <[email protected]>
---
Coccinelle semantic patch used to find cases:
@@
expression e;

@@
* e & 0xfff

To ensure this change does not affect the functional
behaviour, I compared the generated object files before and
after the change using the `cmp` which compares the two
object files byte by byte as shown below:

$ make drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.o
$ cmp rtw_xmit_before.o rtw_xmit_after.o

No differences were found in the output, confirming that the
change does not alter the compiled output.

drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 2 +-
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c     | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
index 952ce6dd5af9..f712ea0cabee 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
@@ -3511,7 +3511,7 @@ void issue_action_BA(struct adapter *padapter, unsigned char *raddr, unsigned ch
 			/* if ((psta = rtw_get_stainfo(pstapriv, pmlmeinfo->network.mac_address)) != NULL) */
 			psta = rtw_get_stainfo(pstapriv, raddr);
 			if (psta) {
-				start_seq = (psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[status & 0x07]&0xfff) + 1;
+				start_seq = (psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[status & 0x07] % 4096u) + 1;
 
 				psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[status & 0x07] = start_seq;
 
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
index a389ba5ecc6f..25411cc5c738 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
@@ -1641,7 +1641,7 @@ static int check_indicate_seq(struct recv_reorder_ctrl *preorder_ctrl, u16 seq_n
 	struct dvobj_priv *psdpriv = padapter->dvobj;
 	struct debug_priv *pdbgpriv = &psdpriv->drv_dbg;
 	u8 wsize = preorder_ctrl->wsize_b;
-	u16 wend = (preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq + wsize - 1) & 0xFFF;/*  4096; */
+	u16 wend = (preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq + wsize - 1) % 4096u;
 
 	/*  Rx Reorder initialize condition. */
 	if (preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq == 0xFFFF)
@@ -1657,7 +1657,7 @@ static int check_indicate_seq(struct recv_reorder_ctrl *preorder_ctrl, u16 seq_n
 	/*  2. Incoming SeqNum is larger than the WinEnd => Window shift N */
 	/*  */
 	if (SN_EQUAL(seq_num, preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq)) {
-		preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq = (preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq + 1) & 0xFFF;
+		preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq = (preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq + 1) % 4096u;
 
 	} else if (SN_LESS(wend, seq_num)) {
 		/*  boundary situation, when seq_num cross 0xFFF */
@@ -1772,7 +1772,7 @@ static int recv_indicatepkts_in_order(struct adapter *padapter, struct recv_reor
 			list_del_init(&(prframe->u.hdr.list));
 
 			if (SN_EQUAL(preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq, pattrib->seq_num))
-				preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq = (preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq + 1) & 0xFFF;
+				preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq = (preorder_ctrl->indicate_seq + 1) % 4096u;
 
 			/* Set this as a lock to make sure that only one thread is indicating packet. */
 			/* pTS->RxIndicateState = RXTS_INDICATE_PROCESSING; */
-- 
2.34.1