[PATCH 6.12 046/337] netfilter: xt_hashlimit: validate hashtable supports XT_HASHLIMIT_RATE_MATCH

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.patches,org.kernel.vger.stable
Message-ID <[email protected]>
6.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 305b63e1402267459fdabb183af4527f6799eebf ]

The XT_HASHLIMIT_RATE_MATCH flag mode changes the semantics of the
dsthash_ent structure which represents an entry in the hashtable.  There
is a union area which uses a different layout to express the rate match
mode.

Update .checkentry path to validate the XT_HASHLIMIT_RATE_MATCH mode
flag is requested by two or more different rules that refer to the same
hashtable. Otherwise, uninitialized access to the burst field in the
union is possible.

Reject the use of the XT_HASHLIMIT_RATE_MATCH mode flag if set on by
revision less than 3 too.

Fixes: bea74641e378 ("netfilter: xt_hashlimit: add rate match mode")
Reported-and-tested-by: Talha Berk Arslan <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]/
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
 net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c b/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c
index 0859b8f767645..61813010cd319 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ struct xt_hashlimit_htable {
 	refcount_t use;
 	u_int8_t family;
 	bool rnd_initialized;
+	bool ratematch;
 
 	struct hashlimit_cfg3 cfg;	/* config */
 
@@ -325,6 +326,7 @@ static int htable_create(struct net *net, struct hashlimit_cfg3 *cfg,
 		vfree(hinfo);
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
+	hinfo->ratematch = !!(cfg->mode & XT_HASHLIMIT_RATE_MATCH);
 	spin_lock_init(&hinfo->lock);
 
 	switch (revision) {
@@ -868,7 +870,10 @@ static int hashlimit_mt_check_common(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par,
 	}
 
 	/* Check for overflow. */
-	if (revision >= 3 && cfg->mode & XT_HASHLIMIT_RATE_MATCH) {
+	if (cfg->mode & XT_HASHLIMIT_RATE_MATCH) {
+		if (revision < 3)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
 		if (cfg->avg == 0 || cfg->avg > U32_MAX) {
 			pr_info_ratelimited("invalid rate\n");
 			return -ERANGE;
@@ -901,6 +906,15 @@ static int hashlimit_mt_check_common(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par,
 			mutex_unlock(&hashlimit_mutex);
 			return ret;
 		}
+	} else {
+		if ((cfg->mode & XT_HASHLIMIT_RATE_MATCH &&
+		     !(*hinfo)->ratematch) ||
+		    (!(cfg->mode & XT_HASHLIMIT_RATE_MATCH) &&
+		      (*hinfo)->ratematch)) {
+			mutex_unlock(&hashlimit_mutex);
+			htable_put(*hinfo);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&hashlimit_mutex);
 
-- 
2.53.0
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.