[PATCH 7.1 213/438] btrfs: zoned: fix missing chunk metadata reservation

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.patches,org.kernel.vger.stable
Message-ID <[email protected]>
7.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Guanghui Yang <[email protected]>

commit 8bc4d7209611e8aa9d5409b6a4a86a9eb91b69a3 upstream.

reserve_chunk_space() stores the return value of
btrfs_zoned_activate_one_bg() in ret. The helper can return 1 after
successfully activating a block group, but ret is later used to decide
whether to reserve metadata for chunk tree updates.

As a result, successful activation skips btrfs_block_rsv_add() and leaves
trans->chunk_bytes_reserved unchanged. Use a separate variable for the
activation result so positive success does not affect the later
reservation. Keep activation failures in ret instead of returning early so
the function uses the common tail path.

Fixes: b6a98021e401 ("btrfs: zoned: activate necessary block group")
CC: [email protected]
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Guanghui Yang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
 fs/btrfs/block-group.c |   34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
@@ -4504,25 +4504,29 @@ static void reserve_chunk_space(struct b
 		if (IS_ERR(bg)) {
 			ret = PTR_ERR(bg);
 		} else {
+			int activate_ret;
+
 			/*
 			 * We have a new chunk. We also need to activate it for
 			 * zoned filesystem.
 			 */
-			ret = btrfs_zoned_activate_one_bg(info, true);
-			if (ret < 0)
-				return;
-
-			/*
-			 * If we fail to add the chunk item here, we end up
-			 * trying again at phase 2 of chunk allocation, at
-			 * btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(). So ignore
-			 * any error here. An ENOSPC here could happen, due to
-			 * the cases described at do_chunk_alloc() - the system
-			 * block group we just created was just turned into RO
-			 * mode by a scrub for example, or a running discard
-			 * temporarily removed its free space entries, etc.
-			 */
-			btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(trans, bg);
+			activate_ret = btrfs_zoned_activate_one_bg(info, true);
+			if (activate_ret < 0) {
+				ret = activate_ret;
+			} else {
+				/*
+				 * If we fail to add the chunk item here, we end
+				 * up trying again at phase 2 of chunk allocation,
+				 * at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(). So
+				 * ignore any error here. An ENOSPC here could
+				 * happen, due to the cases described at
+				 * do_chunk_alloc() - the system block group we
+				 * just created was just turned into RO mode by a
+				 * scrub for example, or a running discard
+				 * temporarily removed its free space entries, etc.
+				 */
+				btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(trans, bg);
+			}
 		}
 	}
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.