[PATCH 7.1 152/271] packet: synchronize pressure clearing with ring reconfiguration

7.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Zihan Xi <[email protected]>

commit 1a35da325cac4d5bcad76a2aa943408a6f1d9000 upstream.

packet_set_ring() updates the RX ring state under sk_receive_queue.lock,
but used to publish the tpacket receive mode through po->prot_hook.func
after releasing that lock. packet_poll() and packet_recvmsg() can then
run the pressure clearing path after the ring has been cleared while
still seeing tpacket_rcv, causing __packet_rcv_has_room() to dereference
stale or NULL ring storage.

Move the existing receive hook assignment into the same
sk_receive_queue.lock section as the ring state update. Keep the
assignment otherwise unchanged, including on TX ring reconfiguration, to
avoid adding behavior changes that are not required for the fix.

Serialize packet_recvmsg() pressure clearing with the same queue lock
only after PACKET_SOCK_PRESSURE has been observed. If the flag is clear
and the socket has moved away from tpacket_rcv, packet_set_ring() has
already detached the socket and waited for synchronize_net(), so no new
packet input can set the flag again.

packet_poll() already holds sk_receive_queue.lock, so it uses the new
unlocked helper directly.

Fixes: 2ccdbaa6d55b ("packet: rollover lock contention avoidance")
Cc: [email protected]
Reported-by: Vega <[email protected]>
Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.4
Signed-off-by: Zihan Xi <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/f90b5688311fa278d1361ea8c6be0bf25967d591.1785247446.git.zihanx@nebusec.ai
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
 net/packet/af_packet.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -1315,13 +1315,25 @@ static int packet_rcv_has_room(struct pa
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void packet_rcv_try_clear_pressure(struct packet_sock *po)
+static void __packet_rcv_try_clear_pressure(struct packet_sock *po)
 {
 	if (packet_sock_flag(po, PACKET_SOCK_PRESSURE) &&
 	    __packet_rcv_has_room(po, NULL) == ROOM_NORMAL)
 		packet_sock_flag_set(po, PACKET_SOCK_PRESSURE, false);
 }
 
+static void packet_rcv_try_clear_pressure(struct packet_sock *po)
+{
+	struct sock *sk = &po->sk;
+
+	if (!packet_sock_flag(po, PACKET_SOCK_PRESSURE))
+		return;
+
+	spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+	__packet_rcv_try_clear_pressure(po);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+}
+
 static void packet_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_error_queue);
@@ -4314,7 +4326,7 @@ static __poll_t packet_poll(struct file
 			TP_STATUS_KERNEL))
 			mask |= EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
 	}
-	packet_rcv_try_clear_pressure(po);
+	__packet_rcv_try_clear_pressure(po);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
 	spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_write_queue.lock);
 	if (po->tx_ring.pg_vec) {
@@ -4554,14 +4566,14 @@ static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *
 		rb->frame_max = (req->tp_frame_nr - 1);
 		rb->head = 0;
 		rb->frame_size = req->tp_frame_size;
+		po->prot_hook.func = (po->rx_ring.pg_vec) ?
+						tpacket_rcv : packet_rcv;
 		spin_unlock_bh(&rb_queue->lock);
 
 		swap(rb->pg_vec_order, order);
 		swap(rb->pg_vec_len, req->tp_block_nr);
 
 		rb->pg_vec_pages = req->tp_block_size/PAGE_SIZE;
-		po->prot_hook.func = (po->rx_ring.pg_vec) ?
-						tpacket_rcv : packet_rcv;
 		skb_queue_purge(rb_queue);
 		if (atomic_long_read(&po->mapped))
 			pr_err("packet_mmap: vma is busy: %ld\n",