[PATCH 6.1 505/609] bpf: tcp: Get rid of st_bucket_done
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.patches,org.kernel.vger.stable |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jordan Rife <[email protected]> [ Upstream commit e25ab9b874a4bd8c6e3e5ce66cbe8a1dd4096e2e ] Get rid of the st_bucket_done field to simplify TCP iterator state and logic. Before, st_bucket_done could be false if bpf_iter_tcp_batch returned a partial batch; however, with the last patch ("bpf: tcp: Make sure iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot"), st_bucket_done == true is equivalent to iter->cur_sk == iter->end_sk. Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]> Stable-dep-of: e5fd3f514e27 ("bpf: tcp: Fix use-after-free in bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch()") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> --- net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 14 ++++++-------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c index 70c15160d2491..fb975e8f55ae5 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c @@ -2731,7 +2731,6 @@ struct bpf_tcp_iter_state { unsigned int end_sk; unsigned int max_sk; struct sock **batch; - bool st_bucket_done; }; struct bpf_iter__tcp { @@ -2754,8 +2753,10 @@ static int tcp_prog_seq_show(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_iter_meta *meta, static void bpf_iter_tcp_put_batch(struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter) { - while (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk) - sock_gen_put(iter->batch[iter->cur_sk++]); + unsigned int cur_sk = iter->cur_sk; + + while (cur_sk < iter->end_sk) + sock_gen_put(iter->batch[cur_sk++]); } static int bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter, @@ -2872,7 +2873,7 @@ static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_batch(struct seq_file *seq) * one by one in the current bucket and eventually find out * it has to advance to the next bucket. */ - if (iter->st_bucket_done) { + if (iter->end_sk && iter->cur_sk == iter->end_sk) { st->offset = 0; st->bucket++; if (st->state == TCP_SEQ_STATE_LISTENING && @@ -2884,7 +2885,6 @@ static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_batch(struct seq_file *seq) iter->cur_sk = 0; iter->end_sk = 0; - iter->st_bucket_done = true; sk = tcp_seek_last_pos(seq); if (!sk) @@ -3032,10 +3032,8 @@ static void bpf_iter_tcp_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v) (void)tcp_prog_seq_show(prog, &meta, v, 0); } - if (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk) { + if (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk) bpf_iter_tcp_put_batch(iter); - iter->st_bucket_done = false; - } } static const struct seq_operations bpf_iter_tcp_seq_ops = { -- 2.53.0