[PATCH 6.1 505/609] bpf: tcp: Get rid of st_bucket_done

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.patches,org.kernel.vger.stable
Message-ID <[email protected]>
6.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jordan Rife <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit e25ab9b874a4bd8c6e3e5ce66cbe8a1dd4096e2e ]

Get rid of the st_bucket_done field to simplify TCP iterator state and
logic. Before, st_bucket_done could be false if bpf_iter_tcp_batch
returned a partial batch; however, with the last patch ("bpf: tcp: Make
sure iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot"),
st_bucket_done == true is equivalent to iter->cur_sk == iter->end_sk.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Stable-dep-of: e5fd3f514e27 ("bpf: tcp: Fix use-after-free in bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 14 ++++++--------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index 70c15160d2491..fb975e8f55ae5 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -2731,7 +2731,6 @@ struct bpf_tcp_iter_state {
 	unsigned int end_sk;
 	unsigned int max_sk;
 	struct sock **batch;
-	bool st_bucket_done;
 };
 
 struct bpf_iter__tcp {
@@ -2754,8 +2753,10 @@ static int tcp_prog_seq_show(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_iter_meta *meta,
 
 static void bpf_iter_tcp_put_batch(struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter)
 {
-	while (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk)
-		sock_gen_put(iter->batch[iter->cur_sk++]);
+	unsigned int cur_sk = iter->cur_sk;
+
+	while (cur_sk < iter->end_sk)
+		sock_gen_put(iter->batch[cur_sk++]);
 }
 
 static int bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter,
@@ -2872,7 +2873,7 @@ static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_batch(struct seq_file *seq)
 	 * one by one in the current bucket and eventually find out
 	 * it has to advance to the next bucket.
 	 */
-	if (iter->st_bucket_done) {
+	if (iter->end_sk && iter->cur_sk == iter->end_sk) {
 		st->offset = 0;
 		st->bucket++;
 		if (st->state == TCP_SEQ_STATE_LISTENING &&
@@ -2884,7 +2885,6 @@ static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_batch(struct seq_file *seq)
 
 	iter->cur_sk = 0;
 	iter->end_sk = 0;
-	iter->st_bucket_done = true;
 
 	sk = tcp_seek_last_pos(seq);
 	if (!sk)
@@ -3032,10 +3032,8 @@ static void bpf_iter_tcp_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 			(void)tcp_prog_seq_show(prog, &meta, v, 0);
 	}
 
-	if (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk) {
+	if (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk)
 		bpf_iter_tcp_put_batch(iter);
-		iter->st_bucket_done = false;
-	}
 }
 
 static const struct seq_operations bpf_iter_tcp_seq_ops = {
-- 
2.53.0
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.