[PATCH 7.1 002/228] selinux: require every boolean value to be defined

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.patches,org.kernel.vger.stable
Message-ID <[email protected]>
7.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Bryam Vargas <[email protected]>

commit a93d37a09b863810653f93d371fb197457d59deb upstream.

p_bools.nprim comes from the policy image independently of how many
booleans follow it, and cond_index_bool() fills bool_val_to_struct[] at
value - 1, so a count larger than the values present leaves NULL entries.
Every user of that array then walks it by index and dereferences each
entry: cond_evaluate_expr() on the access-vector path,
security_get_bools() and security_get_bool_value() behind selinuxfs, and
security_set_bools(). A sparse class value is absorbed by
policydb_class_isvalid() and its siblings; booleans have no such
predicate, and no consumer that could use one.

Reject a boolean value that no boolean defines, once, where the array is
built. Conforming policies define every boolean they declare and are
unaffected.

Cc: [email protected]
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Bryam Vargas <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
 security/selinux/ss/policydb.c |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

--- a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c
+++ b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c
@@ -721,6 +721,7 @@ static inline void symtab_hash_eval(stru
 static int policydb_index(struct policydb *p)
 {
 	int i, rc;
+	u32 v;
 
 	if (p->mls_enabled)
 		pr_debug(
@@ -772,6 +773,24 @@ static int policydb_index(struct policyd
 		if (rc)
 			goto out;
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * A sparse class value is absorbed by policydb_class_isvalid() and
+	 * its siblings, but no such predicate exists for booleans: every
+	 * user of bool_val_to_struct[] walks it by index and dereferences
+	 * each entry -- cond_evaluate_expr(), the two getters and
+	 * security_set_bools() -- so an unclaimed one has no consumer that
+	 * can tolerate it.
+	 */
+	for (v = 0; v < p->p_bools.nprim; v++) {
+		if (!p->bool_val_to_struct[v]) {
+			pr_err("SELinux:  boolean %u is declared but not defined\n",
+			       v + 1);
+			rc = -EINVAL;
+			goto out;
+		}
+	}
+
 	rc = 0;
 out:
 	return rc;
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.