Re: [Powertop] Does PowerTop support MHz numbers for Intel Xeon L5410 CPUs ?

Valentin Hoebel <valentin.hoebel at nfon.com>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.powertop
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

thanks a lot for your efforts, I appreciate it.
My co-worker applied your patch and sent me the following output:

   --------------------------------------------------
/   ./powertop -t 1 --csv
                                             ⏎
Loaded 0 prior measurements
Cannot load from file /var/cache/powertop/saved_parameters.powertop
check cpu model 0x17
ERROR: not supported
RAPL device for cpu 0
RAPL device for cpu 0
check cpu model 0x17
ERROR: not supported
check cpu model 0x17
ERROR: not supported
check cpu model 0x17
ERROR: not supported
check cpu model 0x17
ERROR: not supported
check cpu model 0x17
ERROR: not supported
check cpu model 0x17
ERROR: not supported
check cpu model 0x17
ERROR: not supported
check cpu model 0x17
ERROR: not supported
Cannot load from file /var/cache/powertop/saved_parameters.powertop
Preparing to take measurements
   unknown op '{'
Taking 1 measurement(s) for a duration of 1 second(s) each.
PowerTOP outputing using base filename powertop.csv

\ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I hope this helps.

Best regards
Valentin



Am 07.07.2014 12:28, schrieb Sergey Senozhatsky:
> On (07/07/14 19:26), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
>> On (07/07/14 10:21), Valentin Hoebel wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> as you already guessed Debian still uses a 2.0 version.
>>> However, I git cloned 2.6.1 and the "head" versions from GitHub, built them
>>> both and tried them - still the same result.
>>>
>>> Is it known if this particular CPU model does not support reading out the
>>> CPU frequency values or could this be another problem?
>>
>> hm... a *wild* guess. can you check what cpu model is getting passed to
>> nhm_core::nhm_core(int model)? the problem might be (or might be not) that we
>> don't set any of C-state flags. if none of C-states set, then no MSR work is
>> getting done, and hence nothing is reported back. (yeah... we could check
>> documentation, search the web, etc. but let's do it the lazy way).
>>
>>
>> something like this
>>
>
> oh. the patch is against the current upstream (iow, git) powertop source code.
>
> 	-ss
>
>> NOTE:
>> NOT TESTED, NOT EVEN COMPILE-TESTED. NOT A PATCH, NOT A FIX.
>> FOR TESTING PURPOSE ONLY.
>>
>> ---
>>
>>   src/cpu/intel_cpus.cpp | 7 +++++++
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/cpu/intel_cpus.cpp b/src/cpu/intel_cpus.cpp
>> index e3cdaf2..ae083cf 100644
>> --- a/src/cpu/intel_cpus.cpp
>> +++ b/src/cpu/intel_cpus.cpp
>> @@ -64,10 +64,13 @@ int is_supported_intel_cpu(int model)
>>   {
>>   	int i;
>>
>> +	fprintf(stderr, "check cpu model 0x%X\n", model);
>> +
>>   	for (i = 0; intel_cpu_models[i] != 0; i++)
>>   		if (model == intel_cpu_models[i])
>>   			return 1;
>>
>> +	printf(stderr, "ERROR: not supported\n");
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -91,6 +94,8 @@ nhm_core::nhm_core(int model)
>>   {
>>   	has_c2c7_res = 0;
>>
>> +	fprintf(stderr, "nhm_core model: 0x%X\n", model);
>> +
>>   	switch(model) {
>>   		case 0x2A:	/* SNB */
>>   		case 0x2D:	/* SNB Xeon */
>> @@ -260,6 +265,8 @@ nhm_package::nhm_package(int model)
>>   	has_c8c9c10_res = 0;
>>   	has_c2c7_res = 0;
>>
>> +	fprintf(stderr, "nhm_package model: 0x%X\n", model);
>> +
>>   	switch(model) {
>>   		case 0x2A:	/* SNB */
>>   		case 0x2D:	/* SNB Xeon */
>>

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Valentin Höbel
Cloud Architect

NFON AG
Leonrodstraße 68
D-80636 München

Telefon +49 89 45300-407
valentin.hoebel(a)nfon.com
www.nfon.com

Support-Hotline der NFON AG
Telefon 0800 - 6366 555

Die gesetzlichen Pflichtangaben finden Sie unter 
https://www.nfon.net/pflichtangaben
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.