Re: CUPS & IPP_TAG_EXTENSION

Alexander Pevzner <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:16:49 +0300

Newsgroups	dev.linux.lists.printing-architecture
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Michael,

On 3/22/24 18:40, Michael Sweet wrote:
> Wow, good catch!

I actually caught it a while ago, when was actively working on goipp and 
looked to the CUPS sources to compare both implementations. But forgot 
to report it in time, sorry for that.

> The RFC.  CUPS is broken in this respect, but then there have never been any extended types in standards-track nor vendor implementations that I am aware of, which is probably why we've never had problems... :)

This is quite obvious. But if we have this code for some reason, we 
obviously want it to be correct :)

-- 

	Wishes, Alexander Pevzner ([email protected])