Re: [PATCH net-next v4 06/15] quic: add stream management
Xin Long <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Nov 2025 20:27:19 -0500
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.quic,dev.linux.lists.kernel-tls-handshake,org.kernel.vger.linux-cifs,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADvbK_c2gUNyDNYfgVrQ+Cm9rL6P_n+s0LJsrAPz0VK9FDDxyg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 6:05 AM Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 10/29/25 3:35 PM, Xin Long wrote: > +/* Create and register new streams for sending. */ > > +static struct quic_stream *quic_stream_send_create(struct quic_stream_table *streams, > > + s64 max_stream_id, u8 is_serv) > > +{ > > + struct quic_stream *stream = NULL; > > + s64 stream_id; > > + > > + stream_id = streams->send.next_bidi_stream_id; > > + if (quic_stream_id_uni(max_stream_id)) > > + stream_id = streams->send.next_uni_stream_id; > > + > > + /* rfc9000#section-2.1: A stream ID that is used out of order results in all streams > > + * of that type with lower-numbered stream IDs also being opened. > > + */ > > + while (stream_id <= max_stream_id) { > > + stream = kzalloc(sizeof(*stream), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT); > > + if (!stream) > > + return NULL; > > + > > + stream->id = stream_id; > > + if (quic_stream_id_uni(stream_id)) { > > + stream->send.max_bytes = streams->send.max_stream_data_uni; > > + > > + if (streams->send.next_uni_stream_id < stream_id + QUIC_STREAM_ID_STEP) > > + streams->send.next_uni_stream_id = stream_id + QUIC_STREAM_ID_STEP; > > It's unclear to me the goal the above 2 statements. Dealing with id > wrap-arounds? If 'streams->send.next_uni_stream_id < stream_id + > QUIC_STREAM_ID_STEP' is not true the next quic_stream_send_create() will > reuse the same stream_id. > > I moving the above in a separate helper with some comments would help. > I will add a macro for this: #define quic_stream_id_next_update(limits, type, id) \ do { \ if ((limits)->next_##type##_stream_id < (id) + QUIC_STREAM_ID_STEP) \ (limits)->next_##type##_stream_id = (id) + QUIC_STREAM_ID_STEP; \ (limits)->streams_##type++; \ } while (0) So that we can use it to update both next_uni_stream_id and next_bidi_stream_id. > > > + streams->send.streams_uni++; > > + > > + quic_stream_add(streams, stream); > > + stream_id += QUIC_STREAM_ID_STEP; > > + continue; > > + } > > + > > + if (streams->send.next_bidi_stream_id < stream_id + QUIC_STREAM_ID_STEP) > > + streams->send.next_bidi_stream_id = stream_id + QUIC_STREAM_ID_STEP; > > + streams->send.streams_bidi++; > > + > > + if (quic_stream_id_local(stream_id, is_serv)) { > > + stream->send.max_bytes = streams->send.max_stream_data_bidi_remote; > > + stream->recv.max_bytes = streams->recv.max_stream_data_bidi_local; > > + } else { > > + stream->send.max_bytes = streams->send.max_stream_data_bidi_local; > > + stream->recv.max_bytes = streams->recv.max_stream_data_bidi_remote; > > + } > > + stream->recv.window = stream->recv.max_bytes; > > + > > + quic_stream_add(streams, stream); > > + stream_id += QUIC_STREAM_ID_STEP; > > + } > > + return stream; > > +} > > + > > +/* Create and register new streams for receiving. */ > > +static struct quic_stream *quic_stream_recv_create(struct quic_stream_table *streams, > > + s64 max_stream_id, u8 is_serv) > > +{ > > + struct quic_stream *stream = NULL; > > + s64 stream_id; > > + > > + stream_id = streams->recv.next_bidi_stream_id; > > + if (quic_stream_id_uni(max_stream_id)) > > + stream_id = streams->recv.next_uni_stream_id; > > + > > + /* rfc9000#section-2.1: A stream ID that is used out of order results in all streams > > + * of that type with lower-numbered stream IDs also being opened. > > + */ > > + while (stream_id <= max_stream_id) { > > + stream = kzalloc(sizeof(*stream), GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_ACCOUNT); > > + if (!stream) > > + return NULL; > > + > > + stream->id = stream_id; > > + if (quic_stream_id_uni(stream_id)) { > > + stream->recv.window = streams->recv.max_stream_data_uni; > > + stream->recv.max_bytes = stream->recv.window; > > + > > + if (streams->recv.next_uni_stream_id < stream_id + QUIC_STREAM_ID_STEP) > > + streams->recv.next_uni_stream_id = stream_id + QUIC_STREAM_ID_STEP; > > + streams->recv.streams_uni++; > > + > > + quic_stream_add(streams, stream); > > + stream_id += QUIC_STREAM_ID_STEP; > > + continue; > > + } > > + > > + if (streams->recv.next_bidi_stream_id < stream_id + QUIC_STREAM_ID_STEP) > > + streams->recv.next_bidi_stream_id = stream_id + QUIC_STREAM_ID_STEP; > > + streams->recv.streams_bidi++; > > + > > + if (quic_stream_id_local(stream_id, is_serv)) { > > + stream->send.max_bytes = streams->send.max_stream_data_bidi_remote; > > + stream->recv.max_bytes = streams->recv.max_stream_data_bidi_local; > > + } else { > > + stream->send.max_bytes = streams->send.max_stream_data_bidi_local; > > + stream->recv.max_bytes = streams->recv.max_stream_data_bidi_remote; > > + } > > + stream->recv.window = stream->recv.max_bytes; > > + > > + quic_stream_add(streams, stream); > > + stream_id += QUIC_STREAM_ID_STEP; > > + } > > + return stream; > > +} > > The above 2 functions has a lot of code in common. I think you could > deduplicate it by: > - defining a named type for quic_stream_table.{send,recv} > - define a generic /() helper using an additonal > argument for the relevant table.{send,recv} > - replace the above 2 functions with a single invocation to such helper. This is a very smart idea! It will dedup not only quic_stream_recv_create(), but also quic_stream_get_param() and quic_stream_set_param(). I will define a type named 'struct quic_stream_limits'. Note that, since we must pass 'bool send' to quic_stream_create() for setting the fields in a single 'stream' . if (quic_stream_id_uni(stream_id)) { if (send) { stream->send.max_bytes = limits->max_stream_data_uni; } else { stream->recv.max_bytes = limits->max_stream_data_uni; stream->recv.window = stream->recv.max_bytes; } I'm planning not to pass additional argument of table.{send,recv}, but do this in quic_stream_create(): struct quic_stream_limits *limits = &streams->send; gfp_t gfp = GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT; if (!send) { limits = &streams->recv; gfp = GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_ACCOUNT; } > > It looks like there are more de-dup opportunity below. > Yes, the difference is only the variable name _uni_ and _bidi_. I'm planning to de-dup them with macros like: #define quic_stream_id_below_next(streams, type, id, send) \ ((send) ? ((id) < (streams)->send.next_##type##_stream_id) : \ ((id) < (streams)->recv.next_##type##_stream_id)) /* Check if a send or receive stream ID is already closed. */ static bool quic_stream_id_closed(struct quic_stream_table *streams, s64 stream_id, bool send) { if (quic_stream_id_uni(stream_id)) return quic_stream_id_below_next(streams, uni, stream_id, send); return quic_stream_id_below_next(streams, bidi, stream_id, send); } #define quic_stream_id_above_max(streams, type, id) \ (((id) > (streams)->send.max_##type##_stream_id) ? true : \ (quic_stream_id_to_streams((id) - (streams)->send.next_##type##_stream_id) + \ (streams)->send.streams_##type > (streams)->send.max_streams_##type)) /* Check if a stream ID would exceed local (recv) or peer (send) limits. */ bool quic_stream_id_exceeds(struct quic_stream_table *streams, s64 stream_id, bool send) { if (!send) { if (quic_stream_id_uni(stream_id)) return stream_id > streams->recv.max_uni_stream_id; return stream_id > streams->recv.max_bidi_stream_id; } if (quic_stream_id_uni(stream_id)) return quic_stream_id_above_max(streams, uni, stream_id); return quic_stream_id_above_max(streams, bidi, stream_id); } Do you think it's worth it? > > + > > +/* Check if a send or receive stream ID is already closed. */ > > +static bool quic_stream_id_closed(struct quic_stream_table *streams, s64 stream_id, bool send) > > +{ > > + if (quic_stream_id_uni(stream_id)) { > > + if (send) > > + return stream_id < streams->send.next_uni_stream_id; > > + return stream_id < streams->recv.next_uni_stream_id; > > + } > > + if (send) > > + return stream_id < streams->send.next_bidi_stream_id; > > + return stream_id < streams->recv.next_bidi_stream_id; > > +} > > + > > +/* Check if a stream ID would exceed local (recv) or peer (send) limits. */ > > +bool quic_stream_id_exceeds(struct quic_stream_table *streams, s64 stream_id, bool send) > > +{ > > + u64 nstreams; > > + > > + if (!send) { > > + if (quic_stream_id_uni(stream_id)) > > + return stream_id > streams->recv.max_uni_stream_id; > > + return stream_id > streams->recv.max_bidi_stream_id; > > + } > > + > > + if (quic_stream_id_uni(stream_id)) { > > + if (stream_id > streams->send.max_uni_stream_id) > > + return true; > > + stream_id -= streams->send.next_uni_stream_id; > > + nstreams = quic_stream_id_to_streams(stream_id); > > + return nstreams + streams->send.streams_uni > streams->send.max_streams_uni; > > + } > > + > > + if (stream_id > streams->send.max_bidi_stream_id) > > + return true; > > + stream_id -= streams->send.next_bidi_stream_id; > > + nstreams = quic_stream_id_to_streams(stream_id); > > + return nstreams + streams->send.streams_bidi > streams->send.max_streams_bidi; > > +} > > + > > +/* Get or create a send stream by ID. */ > > +struct quic_stream *quic_stream_send_get(struct quic_stream_table *streams, s64 stream_id, > > + u32 flags, bool is_serv) > > +{ > > + struct quic_stream *stream; > > + > > + if (!quic_stream_id_valid(stream_id, is_serv, true)) > > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > > + > > + stream = quic_stream_find(streams, stream_id); > > + if (stream) { > > You should add some comments and possibly lockdep annotation/static > check about the expected locking for the whole stream lifecycle. > sk is not seen in this file, so I will add some comments to describe this will also be called under the sock lock. Thanks.