Re: [PATCH rtw-next v2] wifi: rtl8xxxu: Detect the maximum supported channel width
Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.regressions,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2026-05-12 at 10:54 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > You > > > can cherry-pick or directly apply the fix to a pending branch (or even > > > ask Linus to merge it directly from the list, but that is likely not > > > worth it here) and git will normally later notice this and fully > > > automatically handle everything when the fix comes in again during the > > > next merge window. > > > > I know git can handle that, but is it an acceptable practice for single one > > commit to appear twice? > > Depends on whom you ask. I'd say: It's kinda normal. It's best avoided > if there is no need, but if there is a need (like here) it's fine. And > some subsystems it even happens regularly iirc. FWIW, it's generally frowned upon and actually uncommon enough that linux-next actively warns about it [1] (or at least used to?), so I wouldn't really say your description here is all that accurate. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/?q=%22duplicate+patch+in+the%22 What does happen fairly frequently is the same immutable commit getting merged through different branches, but that's a single commit, not the same change being committed twice. johannes