Re: the stuttering regression in 7.0: should I have done something different

Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.regressions,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.sparclinux
Message-ID <87se7sxx7c.ffs@tglx>
Hi!

On Fri, May 15 2026 at 19:51, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Fri, 2026-05-15 at 17:35 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > Thank you again for the debugging guidance and for the feedback on my 
>> > original patch addressing the timer starvation issue. It was a pleasure 
>> > contributing to the resolution.
>> 
>> Thank you for going through the hassle of chasing it down and providing
>> the debug data to analyze it.
>> 
>> I'm still puzzled how this went unnoticed for almost two decades:
>> 
>>    112f48716d9f ("[SPARC64]: Add clocksource/clockevents support.")
>
> My suspicion is that it was previously visible only in certain edge cases,
> in particular on machines with many cores and high load.
>
> Case in point: In the past, SPARC LDOMs with lots of virtual CPUs could
> crash in rares cases when building packages such as GCC or LLVM and running
> their testsuites.

I assume those occasional failures did not leave conclusive hints around.

> I don't know if Tony's patch fixes this long-time issue that we have observed
> in the past on Debian's buildds, but I think that the chances aren't too bad.

Good luck!

> Thanks to both of you for hunting this down!

For some stupid reasons I like such puzzles :)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.