Re: [GIT PULL] bluetooth 2026-05-14
Greg KH <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.regressions,org.kernel.vger.linux-bluetooth,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kernel.vger.stable |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2026051909-impurity-nemesis-2f65@gregkh> |
On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 12:53:49PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 5/19/26 12:30, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 09:04:38AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >> On 5/15/26 17:10, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >>> On 5/14/26 19:23, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> The following changes since commit c78bdba7b9666020c0832150a4fc4c0aebc7c6ac:
> >>>> net: phy: DP83TC811: add reading of abilities (2026-05-14 15:17:12 +0200)
> >>>>
> >>>> are available in the Git repository at:
> >>>>
> >>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bluetooth/bluetooth.git tags/for-net-2026-05-14
> >>>>
> >>>> for you to fetch changes up to 375ba7484132662a4a8c7547d088fb6275c00282:
> >>>>
> >>>> Bluetooth: hci_qca: Convert timeout from jiffies to ms (2026-05-14 09:58:08 -0400)
> >>>
> >>> It seems this PR sadly came too late for this week's net PR to mainline
> >>> that was merged yesterday.
> >>>
> >>> TWIMC, from my point of view, it would be great if we somehow could
> >>> still get the changes from this PR or at least the btmtk fix it
> >>> contains[1] to mainline this week before -rc4, as it is fixing a
> >>> regression known since 2026-04-24 that at least five people encountered
> >>> with mainline since -rc3 due to 634a4408c0615c ("Bluetooth: btmtk:
> >>> validate WMT event SKB length before struct access") [006b9943b982 in
> >>> -next].
> >>
> >> Greg, Sasha, that [1] fix I was talking about now reached -next as
> >> 162b1adeb057d2 ("Bluetooth: btmtk: accept too short WMT FUNC_CTRL
> >> events") and will likely hit mainline on Thursday or so with the weekly
> >> -net PR to -mainline. If that's good enough for you, I'd say it would be
> >> good to pick this up for the next round of stable kernels.
> >
> > That "Fixes:" tag is referring to something that is also not in any
> > tree, but that commit does have a cc: stable in it. So do we need both
> > of these:
>
> Valid question, as yes, there is a slight mixup here:
>
> > 041e88fb0c08 ("Bluetooth: btmtk: validate WMT event SKB length before struct access")
>
> That is already in v7.0.7, v6.18.30, v6.12.88, as 041e88fb0c08 is the
> -next commit-id for mainline commit-id 634a4408c0615c ("Bluetooth:
> btmtk: validate WMT event SKB length before struct access") -- the one
> that is causing the regression that I want to get fixed. So we now only
> need:
>
> > 162b1adeb057 ("Bluetooth: btmtk: accept too short WMT FUNC_CTRL events")
Ok, but that "Fixes:" tag pointing to an invalid commit is going to be a
nightmare to track over time, ugh.
I'll go queue this up now, thanks.
greg k-h