Re: [PATCH] memory: atmel-ebi: Allow deferred probing
Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.regressions,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-mtd,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.stable |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 28/05/2026 16:44, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 5/4/26 19:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> >> On Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:59:30 +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: >>> After removing of_platform_default_populate() calls the atmel-ebi driver >>> was affected by deferred probing. platform_driver_probe() is >>> incompatible with deferred probing. This led to atmel-ebi driver >>> eventually not being probed on at91 sam9x60-curiosity and other sam9x60 >>> based boards. Subsequently the nand-controller driver (nand-controller >>> being a child node of ebi) on that platform was not probed and thus raw >>> NAND flash was inaccessible, preventing devices to boot with rootfs on >>> raw NAND flash (e.g. with UBI/UBIFS). >>> >>> [...] >> >> Applied, thanks! >> >> [1/1] memory: atmel-ebi: Allow deferred probing >> https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux-mem-ctrl/c/754d60ad1c91895be0bc7d771fbf9fb3c9448640 > > Lo! What's the status of this regression fix? It seems to be sitting in > next for a while already. To me as an outsider it looks like this should > be on track to get it merged for -rc6, as that's when Linus ideally > wants all regressions fixed; but it looks a bit like this is destined to > be merged in the next merge window. But I might be entirely wrong here > -- or I'm right and there are good reasons why the next merge window is > better here. Thanks for pinging. This indeed deserves fixing in current RC and I completely missed that. Or applied on wrong branch and forgot that it is a fix. I sent RC fix pull request with this now. Best regards, Krzysztof