Re: IPv6 address insertion order (was Re: [PATCH net v2] Revert "ipv6: preserve insertion order for same-scope addresses")
Andrew Lunn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.regressions,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 04:44:19PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > I get the impression there's a rough consensus that the best we can do > now is revert this change (already done), and make a new patch which > changes the insertion order to the "correct" one conditional on a new > flag. > > Stefano has enough other fires to fight, so I'm taking a look at > implementing that. Some initial thoughts, that I'm soliciting > feedback on: I've only been partially reading along... Are we talking about RTM_NEWADDR? I've never worked on the code dealing with addresses. But in general, if you want to add new functionality to a netlink message, you add a new attribute to the message. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.0.10/source/include/uapi/linux/if_addr.h#L26 Andrew