Re: Test result / finding of "drm/amd/display: Consult MCCS FreeSync cap only if requested & supported"

Michel Dänzer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.regressions,org.freedesktop.lists.amd-gfx
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 6/4/26 15:20, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 3:59 AM Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 5/29/26 00:02, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
>>>> From: Thorsten Leemhuis <[email protected]>
>>>> On 5/21/26 09:09, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that some kind of short-term solution is needed for the regression(s) in
>>>> 7.1-rc.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, that would be good. Makes me wonder how the rough plan to realize
>>>> this looks like? Sounds like Michael's patch[1] that was discussed here is not a
>>>> good option? Reminder, Linus ideally wants known regression fixed by -rc6,
>>>> which is why I'm asking.
>>>
>>> @Wentland, Harry can you sort this out for next week's -fixes PR?
>>
>> Looks like this regression will make it to 7.1 final?
>>
>> I filed https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/work_items/5286 3 weeks ago, and proposed a fix the following week. There's been no reaction by any AMD display developer.
>>
>> This is pretty sad.
> 
> @Wentland, Harry , @Leo (Sunpeng) Li come on guys!  I've picked up
> Michel's patch and I'll send an update -PR today.

Thanks Alex.


Note that Pei-Hsin reported an issue when running with my fix at the start of this thread, unfortunately it's still unclear if that's a regression of my fix or happens even without it (in which case it might be another regression of the MCCS related changes for 7.1).

An alternative would be reverting the 4 commits d49086491bcb..8dc88c6a5948.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer       \        GNOME / Xwayland / Mesa developer
https://redhat.com             \               Libre software enthusiast
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.